Answer:
The correct option here is B)
Explanation:
The non compete clause is an agreement between an employer and employee ( as it is in this question between Roger and HR consulting firm ) , where an employee agree to the wishes of employer to not to work for firms which are competing against the employer in the same market.
<span>According to Ogburn, inventions can include both material technological artifacts which change what sorts of things that can be done and the sets of customs, rules, and conventions that allow those material inventions to be of use to members of society. For example, there were various material technological inventions which made the automobile possible (the internal combustion engine, vulcanized rubber, the universal joint), but in order for the automobile to become integrated into society a number of non-material inventions were also necessary such as road networks, agreed upon rules of the road, licensing regimes, and so on.</span>
Answer:
B. referent power is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- Referent power is the capability of a leader who has the power to influence and motivate followers.
- Referent power is power gained by those individuals who have influential and effective interpersonal relationships abilities.
- The advantage of referent power is that the referent leader has the ability to motivate and inspire the workers to be dedicated to their works.
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
A $300
Explanation:
$90-$82= $8
$8-$5= $3
Therefore:
$3×100 shares =$300
The holder has bought the right to buy the stock at $90 per share because She bought this right for a premium of $5 per share. By exercising the call, the holder buys the stock at $90 and in which he /she sells the stock in the market at $82, for a 8 point loss. Since $5 points was paid in premiums, the net loss is 3 points or $300 on the contract covering 100 shares.
