Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
4 < 3(2) + 6
4< 6+6
4 < 12
It was 210 cm.
The function she used is h(t) = 210 + 33t. This is a linear function, since it is of the form f(x) = mx+b. In a linear function, we have the slope, m, which tells us how much the height increases per year, and the y-intercept, b, which tells us how tall it was when we began measuring. Our m value would be 33 and our b would be 210, so the original height was 210.
Answer:
10 terms
Step-by-step explanation:
equate the sum formula to 55 and solve for n
n(n + 1) = 55 ( multiply both sides by 2 to clear the fraction )
n(n + 1) = 110 ← distribute parenthesis on left side
n² + n = 110 ( subtract 110 from both sides )
n² + n - 110 = 0 ← in standard form
Consider the factors of the constant term (- 110) which sum to give the coefficient of the n- term (+ 1)
the factors are + 11 and - 10 , since
11 × - 10 = - 110 and 11 - 10 = + 1 , then
(n + 11)(n - 10) = 0 ← in factored form
equate each factor to zero and solve for n
n + 11 = 0 ⇒ n = - 11
n - 10 = 0 ⇒ n = 10
However, n > 0 , then n = 10
number of terms which sum to 55 is 10
The answer is 17/22 17/20 because of the fractions
9.88 • 10°
^
|
Ten to the power of zero