1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
11

SOMEONE HELP

Mathematics
1 answer:
Sonbull [250]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

  108 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The total length in inches of the perimeter of the model is ...

  7 in + 3 in + 3 in + 5 in = 18 in

The total length of the walkway will have the same ratio to this perimeter that the corresponding sides have:

  EF/AB = 42 ft/(7 in) = (walkway length)/(18 in)

Multiplying by 18 in, we get ...

  walkway length = (42 ft)(18 in)/(7 in)

  walkway length = 108 ft

You might be interested in
F=G(m1-m2)/d2 solve formula for m1 plz... thank you
antoniya [11.8K]

1. f = g(m1 - m2)/d2

2. f d2 = g(m1 - m2)

3. f d2/g + m1 - m2

4. f d2/g + m2 = m1

5. [Answer]  m1 = f d2/g + m2


6 0
3 years ago
Three teams, A, B and C, play in a competition.
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

A = 24

B = 8

C = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

4:3 from B:C

8:6

8 games won by B and 6 games won by C.

3:1 from A:B

24:8

24 by A and 8 by B

8 0
2 years ago
What is the value of x in this equation?<br> Х/2 - x = x/4 + 6
olga nikolaevna [1]
X=-8

Х/2 - x = x/4 + 6
1/2x - x = 1/4x + 6
-1/2x=1/4x+6
-2x=x+24
-2x-x=24
-3x=24
X=-8
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
-8 times the quantity 4 decreased by w
telo118 [61]
If this is what I'm thinking then the answer would be
W-4(-8) or simplified when you combine like terms
W+32
The variable always goes in the front of the expression and -4 times -8 would give you positive 32. (Negative times negative always gives you a positive outcome)
6 0
3 years ago
Is the point (3,2) a solution for x &gt; 4
mixer [17]

Answer:

  No

Step-by-step explanation:

Put the x-value into the inequality and see if it is true:

  3 > 4 . . . . NOT TRUE

No, (3, 2) is not a solution for x > 4.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Through: (4, -1), parallel to y = -3/4x
    9·1 answer
  • Look at all the measurements in model 4. when a number in scientific notation is changed to expanded notation, are any of the ad
    8·2 answers
  • A 1st degree polynomial function whose graph intercepts the y-axis at 8.
    5·1 answer
  • What is the answer to this queation for my maths homework<br> 3a+7=13
    14·1 answer
  • 9.35 fraction into simplest form
    6·2 answers
  • Someone help me pleasd
    13·1 answer
  • Whats the sum of 2x and 3
    9·1 answer
  • The expression a ÷ 4 is equal to __ for a = 1.4
    7·2 answers
  • Plot all points that are a distance of 7 units from 4. What are their values?
    13·1 answer
  • if two parents have 6 children what is the probability that they will have exactly 5 daughters and one son? (assume that boys an
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!