After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
Anti-climax greatly annoys readers. If they're going to put the time into reading something because it has an engaging plot, they're going to expect an equally interesting climax to arise out of that plot. If the readers don't get that, they're going to feel cheated.
The correct answer is:
It reinforces the idea that all people, not just the speaker's father, should fight against death.
<em> "Rage, Rage against the dying of the light" and "Do not go gentle into that good night</em>" this repetition of lines show to the speaker's that everyone should fight death. He explains how all different types of men fight death.
Answer:
The police were not fair.
Explanation:
Edward Coolidge was being accused of murdering a 14-year-old girl. He was the last person the girl was seen with and with whom she kept in touch before being found dead, stabbed and with gunshot marks on her body. How Coolidge was the prime suspect in the crime.
The police needed to go to Coolidge's house to search and seize his car and other objects that could be used in the investigation, for that, the police needed a search and seizure warrant. Who signed the search and seizure mandate was the Attorney General of the case and for that reason, the arrival of the police at Coolidge's home was not fair and violates the fourth institutional amendment.
This is because, for a term to be valid, it must be issued by someone who holds an impartial position in the case investigated.
