Answer: 1. The hero must leave his common world. 2. The hero must venture forth. 3. The hero encounters powers and overcomes them.
Explanation: Heroes' stories often have a pattern that they typically follow. One of the main points that are included in Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey are the following:
1. The hero must leave his common world. At first, the hero refuses to go on the journey, but eventually, they must leave his world to accomplish their mission.
2. The hero must venture forth. When the hero decides to follow the journey, a mentor appears and guides them, to venture forth and face the new world, later on, now being prepared.
3. The hero encounters powers and overcomes them. When the hero gets to the new world, they face enemies, encounter allies, but most of all, domain their powers and use them to fight evil.
After his arrival in Britain, Hastings and his interests were largely ignored by the British businessmen. Through this hyperbolic remark by Hastings, Twain tells the reader that English society at the time was generally unsympathetic toward foreigners.
A critical analysis essay aims to review or to critique something and when you write one you should always use FORMAL (option C) language.
In the second question you want to find the best option that persuades someone to eat tortillas, thus you should use the word ENHANCE (option A), because it means tortillas will improve the flavor or the quality of any dish. In other words, the other options are saying tortillas can be eaten with any dish and that it'll taste good, but if you use enhance, you are saying tortillas will make any dish taste better, which is a persuasive argument.
Answer:
Typically those people dont trust the government, and feel the "evidence" could be fabricated. but let's say they do trust the government, when someone believes something heavily, they have hope in said thing. for example. their are some evidence to argue certain parts of religion, yet religion can also has evidence to prove itself to be real. I hope I explained it good enough.
Group members ignoring the feedback of those they disagree with
