- It should be noted that the failure to vaccinate some children isn an external cost. [See the attached graph]
- The social cost curve is also indicated accordingly.
- From an efficiency perspective, subsidizing vaccines <em>does</em> make sense because, without the subsidy, the equilibrium quantity is <em>less</em> than the socially optimal quantity.
- The school nurse suggests publishing a list of which kids did not get a flu vaccine, in the hope that public shaming will lead people to vaccinate their children. The school nurse is hoping that social norms will act like a <em>punishment </em>and lead the market to a<em> socially efficient </em>
- The flaws that the school nurse's suggestion have are:
- People that feel passionate about not vaccinating are typically doing so for medical or religious reasons and will not sway to social norms or peer pressure. (Option B)
- The school would potentially face a lawsuit because sharing protected health information (PHI), like immunization records, without parents' consent could be a violation depending on the regulations of the state. (Option C)
<h3>What is social Cost?</h3>
In neoclassical economics, the social cost is the total of the transaction's private costs plus the costs imposed on consumers as a result of being exposed to the process for which they are not rewarded or taxed.
In other words, it is the total of internal and external expenses.
Learn more about social cost:
brainly.com/question/28116338
#SPJ1
Answer:
B) government spending and taxes that automatically increase or decrease along with the business cycle.
Explanation:
The two most common automatic stabilizers are: income taxes and unemployment benefits.
When the economy is strong, people make more money, and income tax revenue automatically increases.
On the contrary, when the economy is weak, or in recession, people earn less, and more of them are unemployed. Unemployment benefits therefore increase accordingly.
Answer:
Total Claim = $2416
Explanation:
The coverage on the currency = $250
The coverage on the jewelry = $1000
The limit on the gold, pewter, and silver = $2500
The amount that is stolen:
The amount of cash = $270
The worth of jewelry = $1734
Pewterware = $1666
The miximum coverage = 250 + 1000 + 2500 = $3750
Actual loss = 270 + 1734 + 1666 = $3670
Reimbursement amount = 250 + 1000 + 1666 = $2916
Total Claim = Total Amount Covered – Deductible
Total Claim = $2916 - $500 = $2416
Answer:
$2.07
Explanation:
the complete answer details is found in the attachment below