1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following are effective non verbal strategies for a presentation? Check all that apply .

History
2 answers:
sertanlavr [38]3 years ago
5 0

i think the answer is a and b

ahrayia [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. Standing up straight  

E. Moving around when possible  

D. Making eye contact  

Explanation:

Non-verbal strategies encompass the use of body language, when the individual is able to express himself using his body, through facial expressions, body postures, physical distances and gestures. Based on this, we can conclude that effective non-verbal strategies for a presentation are:

  • C. Standing up straight : The key to being balanced and confident in everything is posture. To be confident, keep your legs aligned with your shoulders and feet, stand up straight. So you show that you are open to the people you are talking to.
  • E. Moving around when possible: It is recommended that presenters of a presentation move from one end of the stage to the other when possible. So you use the whole area of ​​the stage and get closer to the entire audience, making everyone focus on you.
  • D. Making eye contact: Our look communicates a multitude of information! During the presentation, it is through eye contact that we create empathy with the audience. We can convey security, firmness, attitude, and when we look into our eyes as we speak we are seen as more trustworthy and serious.

You might be interested in
Why was the amendment person accused of a crime in the United States "shall enjoy the right to a
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Why has my town experienced record-breaking cold and snowfall if the climate is warming? Is there scientific consensus that people are causing today's climate change? Do natural variations in climate contribute to today's climate change?

4 0
2 years ago
What is the difference in separation of powers and checks and balances?
Andreyy89

Answer for your first question:

  • Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.

For your second question:

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8033338#readmore

<em>[Proper form on Brainly is to ask just one question per post.]</em>

<u>Explanation in regard to your first question:</u>

The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory.  The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu.  (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.")  He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.

Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.  The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.

As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power."  Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:

  • Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
  • The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
  • The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
  • The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
3 0
3 years ago
Why would a nation most likely use military force
tigry1 [53]
To defend territory
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true about the women who worked during World War Two
natka813 [3]
It is C because the men were out to fight the war and in that time only men could have jobs, so when the men left the women had to take over and their role was so important because they were making everything all the soldiers needed like food and ammunition.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
it was a mistake for the United States to make an alliance with the Soviet totalitarian communist union during World War II
omeli [17]

I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate.  An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.  

  • On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews.  The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism.  The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way.  Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
  • On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan.  The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation.  They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war.  And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively.   (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)

So the matter can be argued from both sides.  Pick your side and write a strong essay!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5 coworkers are having lunch and have decided to split the bill evenly the sum 1.95 + 1.95 + 7.95 + 8.95 + 11.25 + 10.95 + 1125
    7·1 answer
  • Cyril and Methodius:_______.
    7·2 answers
  • Item 16
    8·2 answers
  • How did the yuan dynasty’s approach to racial mixing contrast with its approaches to religiously freedom
    8·1 answer
  • To declare a person no longer belongs to the church is called what
    13·2 answers
  • Who helped pay for the settling the James River Colony
    10·1 answer
  • What are several things women helped out with in the military during world war II
    9·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLS??
    15·1 answer
  • In the years after the Civil War, Southern whites, or
    13·2 answers
  • Which explains why freeing Italy and North Africa was part of the Allied strategy for winning the war? It would enable the Allie
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!