1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helen [10]
4 years ago
8

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of being an assertive communicator?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Vadim26 [7]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C.) creating dishonest relationships

Explanation:

marysya [2.9K]4 years ago
3 0
<span>c. Creating dishonest relationships. On the contrary, being an assertive communicator actually allows you to be more honest in conversation, sometimes expressing unpleasant truths.</span>
You might be interested in
Imagine you arrive at a beach in the morning, just as the water was reaching high tide. You build a sandcastle just above the hi
Korolek [52]

Answer:

the high mark changes everyday...or some little brat knocked it over

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The employees of a team are offered a direct incentive hike of 5 percent if they improve their performance two-fold. In the cont
sattari [20]

Answer:

Valence.

Explanation:

Valence is the affective quality referring to the intrinsic attractiveness (positive valence) or averseness (negative valence) of an event, object, or situation. The term also characterizes and categorizes specific emotions. For example, emotions popularly referred to as "negative", such as anger and fear, have negative valence. Joy has positive valence. Positively valenced emotions are evoked by positively valenced events, objects, or situations. The term is also used to describe the hedonic tone of feelings, affect, certain behaviors (for example, approach and avoidance), goal attainment or nonattainment, and conformity with or violation of norms. Ambivalence can be viewed as conflict between positive and negative valence-carriers

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Thinking about party systems, which of the following is NOT an example of “equilibrium?”
dedylja [7]
A, B, C are all examples of equilibrium. So I would have to decide between D and E. In my opinion I think it is D. Because 'E' seems to represent equality since BOTH Democrats and Republicans apply to this rule.

My final answer D. Hope this helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Piaget development theory principles​
MrMuchimi

Answer: assimilation, accommodation and equilibration

Explanation:

Three Main Principles of Piaget's Theory Piaget's theory of cognitive development was based on three main principles which are assimilation, accommodation and equilibration First it is important to define the term 'schema'.

6 0
2 years ago
What race do you think these children​
Step2247 [10]
They might be Middle eastern?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An event or moment when you were less than perfect one page essays
    5·2 answers
  • Who organized the government in the Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay colonies? A) all adult colonists
    9·2 answers
  • Approximately what percentage of high school students drop out?
    5·1 answer
  • Why is psychology considered a social science?
    7·1 answer
  • An antecedent stimulus functions as an _________ only when in its presence a specific response produces reinforcement, and that
    10·1 answer
  • What is another name for Loyalists
    6·1 answer
  • State five effects of galamsey activities on the environment​
    15·1 answer
  • The Immortals were _____
    5·1 answer
  • While in court, speaking to the other party, such as a simple "hello" or giving of directions, is allowable. These communication
    7·1 answer
  • 6. the same brand of chocolate truffles tasted better to elvis when he thought they cost $250 per pound than when he thought the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!