Answer:
(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.
(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).
(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.
I thing b is the answer however, this is more of a subjective question. This question is honestly more about opinion and can be answered differently if you see different points of vue.
Answer:
Retribution
Explanation:
Hello! The person who says the phrase considers that it is fair for the aggressor to apologize or have some punishment for having hurt his wife, this is considered retribution for those who do something morally wrong and pay later, in the same way, or worse as punishment for his inappropriate behavior.
Establishing public schools
