What the problem go ahead?
Answer:
I reject it
Explanation:
The main purpose of Mercantilism is to maximize the exports of products made in one country while minimizing the imports at the same time. This is a very efficient method for a country to accumulate wealth.
But, this practice was what leading to the colonization period.
IN order to minimize import, European countries at that time attack and colonize smaller countries. They extract the resources from them and use it to sustain their own economy. Even though this made European countries gained wealth, it caused a massive economic destruction to the area they colonized.
Answer:
A. Conflict theory
Explanation:
Conflict theory: In sociology, the term conflict theory was proposed by Karl Marx, who believed that the society is considered to be in a state of perpetual conflict due to the competition related to limited resources.
According to conflict theory, social order is being maintained by power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.
The conflict theory represents social life as a competition and aims at the distribution of power, inequality, and resources.
In the question above, the statement signifies the use of the conflict theory.
<u>Answer:
</u>
We can apply some of the similar trends in classical civilizations to the historical experience of people of Teotihuacan to a limited extent as the similarity among the two was found in only the disciplines of politics and trade and commerce.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The administration in the ancient Teotihuacan society was sound and solid as the politics in the region was based on the idea of development.
- The methodology of trade and commerce used by the Teotihuacan people and some nuances of their trade matched with that of classical civilizations.
Answer: You have just committed an attributional bias called: fundamental attribution error.
Explanation: attributional bies reffers to errors made when people try to explain their own behaviour or other's people behaviour based on their own analysis of social situations. In this case, it's a fundamental attribution error because Mark is making an assumption on Allison's behaviour not considering the influence of situational factors and overemphasising the role of dispositional factors such as the distraction Allison may have in her current actions.