1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondor19780726 [428]
3 years ago
11

What is a manuscript?

History
2 answers:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A book or other literary piece of work that is written by hand so the answer is B.

Explanation:

Harman [31]3 years ago
4 0
A Manuscript is a book that has been handwritten. So the correct answer is B.
You might be interested in
Two books that are considered existentialism are
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

The Stranger (Paperback) Albert Camus

Nausea (Hardcover) Jean-Paul Sartre

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
In what ways did the Great Depression affect Germany, Austria, Britain, and France?
noname [10]

Answer:

Nearly two decades after leaving the White House, Herbert Hoover knew precisely where to place the blame for the economic calamity that befell his presidency—and it wasn’t with him. “The primary cause of the Great Depression was the war of 1914-1918,” the former president wrote in his 1952 memoirs. “Without the war there would have been no depression of such dimensions.”

The president scapegoated by many for the economic disaster certainly had the motive to point the historical finger away from himself, but some economists and historians agree with Hoover’s assessment that World War I was the foremost of several causes of the Great Depression.

“There can be little doubt that the deepest roots of the crisis lay in the several chronic infirmities that World War I had inflicted on the international political and economic order,” wrote historian David M. Kennedy. “The war exacted a cruel economic and human toll from the core societies of the advanced industrialized world, including conspicuously Britain, France and Germany.”

“World War I and its aftermath is the dark shadow that hangs over the entire period leading up to the Great Depression,” says Maury Klein, professor emeritus of history at the University of Rhode Island and author of Rainbow’s End: The Crash of 1929. “Pick any policy you want, and you can see how it leads back to World War I.”

America Retreats From the World

While the United States emerged from World War I not only as the world’s leading economic power, but scarred by its involvement in what many Americans saw as a purely European conflict. The disillusionment with World War I led to a retreat from international affairs.

“America was going to make the world safe for democracy and came out disgusted with the whole thing,” Klein says. “The United States emerged as the logical leader on the world stage and then cut out of that role.”

Not wanting to be saddled with the cost of a European war, the United States demanded that the Allies repay money loaned to them during the conflict. “The Allies took the position that if they had to do that, then they would have to collect reparations from Germany that could be used to repay the war loans,” Klein says.

German Reparations Weigh Down Europe

Council of Four at the WWI Paris peace conference, May 27, 1919 (L - R) Great Britain Prime Minister David Lloyd George, Italian Premier Vittorio Orlando, French Premier Georges Clemenceau, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. The treaty signed at the conference saddled Germany with billions of dollars in reparations.

As a result, the punitive Treaty of Versailles required Germany to pay billions of dollars in reparations to Great Britain, France, Belgium and other Allies. “The Peace is outrageous and impossible and can bring nothing but misfortune,” wrote economist John Maynard Keynes after resigning in protest as the British Treasury Department’s chief representative to the peace conference. In his international bestseller The Economic Consequences of the Peace, Keynes argued that the onerous reparations would only further impoverish Germany and exacerbate the damage caused to the European economy by the war.

What ensued was a vicious flow of money back and forth across the Atlantic as American bankers lent money to Germany to pay reparations to the Allies to repay their debts to the United States. With the Allies refusing to ease reparation terms, Germany defaulted on its payments in 1923, and its economy further crumbled when factories shuttered after France and Belgium occupied the industrial Ruhr region to force German repayment.

To come up with the money to meet its obligations, Germany accelerated its currency printing, which caused such hyperinflation that the German mark became virtually worthless. The exchange rate of the German mark to the American dollar plummeted from 32.9 to 1 in 1919 to 433 billion to 1 by 1924. The paper on which German marks were printed had more value as kindling or children’s building blocks than as currency.

Economic Barriers Restrict Trade

While the crippled European economy whimpered, the American economy roared through the Twenties. However, Klein says social changes to the United States as a result of World War I laid the groundwork for the ensuing economic freefall.

“Due to the role they played during the war, businessmen emerged as knights in shining armor,” Klein says, “and the business of the country is business.” Policies enacted by successive Republican administrations resulted in both large tax cuts for big business owners that widened income inequality and a lack of regulation on banks and Wall Street that some historians connect to the start of the Great Depression.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was considered unpatriotic during the World War II? driving a car wearing shoes wasting materials eating
Artist 52 [7]
It would be "wasting materials" that was <span>considered unpatriotic during the World War II, due largely to the fact that the nation was "rationing" materials--since so many had to go towards the war effort. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the U.S. Constitutional Framers make it so that Congress could not diminish judges' pay?
Nataly [62]

Explanation:

Article III of the Constitution establishes and empowers the judicial branch of the national government. The very first sentence of Article III says: “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” So the Constitution itself says that we will have a Supreme Court, and that this Court is separate from both the legislature (Congress) and the executive (the President). It is up to Congress to decide what other federal courts we will have. But one of the first things Congress did in 1789, the year the new government got going, was to set up a federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court—with six Justices. Today, we have a three-level federal court system—trial courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court—with about 800 federal judges. All those judges, and the Justices of the Supreme Court, are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

Why did the Framers guarantee that we would have a Supreme Court (unless the Constitution was amended—a very difficult thing to do) but leave open the possibility that there would be no other federal courts, depending on what the politicians in Congress decided? The answer tells us something about the debates at the time the Constitution was written. To some people in the United States at that time, the federal government seemed almost like a foreign government. Those people’s main loyalty was to their states; the federal government was far away, and they did not feel that they had much of a say in who ran it. If you thought that way, an extensive system of federal courts, staffed by judges who were appointed by the President and who might not have a lot of connections to the state and its government, amounted to allowing the “foreign,” federal government to get its tentacles into every corner of the nation. Other Framers, though, thought that the federal government could not be effective unless it had courts to help enforce its laws. If everything were left up to state courts, states that were hostile to the new federal government might thwart it at every turn.

The compromise was that, just as the Constitution and federal laws would be the “supreme Law of the Land,” there would definitely be a Supreme Court—so a court created by the federal government, with judges appointed by the President, would get the last word, in case state courts did something that was too threatening to the new nation. But the extent and shape of the rest of the federal court system—the degree to which the federal government would be present around the nation—would get hashed out in day-to-day politics. The result is the large and powerful federal judiciary we have today.  

<u><em>sorry its alot to read! but i hope this helps you!! :3</em></u>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"We went on to Greece, and the Greeks led us to the edifices where they worship their God, and we knew not whether we were in he
Rufina [12.5K]
The Correct Answer Is C
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Support or defat that civil war was a second American revolution. back up your answer with evidence
    9·1 answer
  • In Ancient Greece, fishermen would have been most likely to pay tribute to what god before going to sea?
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone help me?
    5·1 answer
  • How many books does the jewish torah have
    5·2 answers
  • Answer genuinely, first correct answer gets brainliest. Plus 20 points. Incorrect answers or fakes ones will be deleted. And rep
    15·2 answers
  • From this lesson, Sufi rituals involve _____. figure skating, dancing, singing, boxing
    14·2 answers
  • When Roosevelt told the world that he would support the Monroe Doctrine, he meant
    9·1 answer
  • The "lliad" and the "Odyssey" are important sources of information about A. actual events occurring during the trojan war
    9·1 answer
  • What achievements did Napoleon make in the domestic sphere and in his work as a military leader?
    15·1 answer
  • How far was President Jackson prepared to go to remove the Indians from the eastern United States?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!