1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lys-0071 [83]
3 years ago
6

After 5 tests, Tisha's average score was 91. After six tests, her average was 89. What was her score on her sixth test?

Mathematics
2 answers:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
4 0
In her last test she got a 79%
Sedaia [141]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

79.

Step-by-step explanation:

first, you have to multiply the first amount of tests by their average score.

(5×91=455)

then you need to multiply the same way for the second set.

(6×89=534)

now we need to flip these numbers, so we can subtract to find the difference.

(6×89=534)

-(5×91=455) =79 test score.

and to fact check it you can add 79 to 455 (which is the total of the original five scores) which will give you 534, you will then divide 534 by 6 to get the average of 89.

You might be interested in
National Ave gas prices
Musya8 [376]
Question: What equation models the data?
For this question I used a software to calculate the equation. When plotted, we can notice that the points form a parabolic function therefore we needed quadratic regression for this one. The quadratic equation is in the form of y=A+Bx+Cx^{2} where y represents the gas prices, x is the year, and A, B, and C are coefficients. I have found A, B, and C using the software and the equation for the data is:

y=-0.092+0.587x-0.026x^{2}

Question: What are the domain and range of the equation?
To find the range of the equation, we just transform the quadratic equation into the form y=a(x-h)^{2}+k. The value for k would be the maximum element in our range, and for the sake of the problem, let's assume that we don't have negative prices.

y=-0.092+0.587x-0.026x^{2}
y+0.092=0.587x-0.026x^{2}
y+0.092=-0.026(x^{2}-22.577x)
y+0.092-0.026(127.442)=-0.026(x^{2}-22.577x+127.442)
y-3.221=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}
y=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}+3.221

We can see that 3.221 is the maximum value of the range while zero is the minimum. Thus, we can express the range as {y|0 \leq y \leq 3.221}

For the domain, the number of years can extend infinitely but it will also depend if we want to consider the years where the price will be negative. Thus, let's just find the year when the price would be zero.

0=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}+3.221
-3.221=-0.026(x-11.289)^{2}
123.885=(x-11.289)^{2}
+-11.130=x-11.289

x=0.159
x=22.419

Anywhere before and after the range of the x values above would result to a negative price therefore we can restrict the domain to those values. However, since x represents the year, we would need to round up the first value and round down the larger value.

Domain: {x|01 \leq x \leq 22}

Question: Do you think your equation is a good fit for the data?
To know whether our equation is a good fit or not, we just look at the value of the correlation coefficient r. We can calculate this manually but in this case I just used a software. According to the software, the value for r is 0.661. This is almost close to a strong correlation which is 0.7 thus we can say that this equation is a good fit.

Question: Is there a trend in the data?
There might be a trend, but it won't be a simple linear one. Since the data initially rose before continuously decreasing, our data would best be described by a quadratic trend. The quadratic trend would be the parabolic equation we just used to model the data.

Question: Does there seem to be a positive correlation, a negative correlation, or neither?
Neither. A positive or negative correlation only applies when we are talking about linear trends, where it's either one variable increases as the other one also increases or the variable decreases as the other one increases. In our case, the price rose and fall as the years increase so there is neither a positive nor a negative correlation.

Question: How much do you expect gas to cost in 2020?
We can answer this question by using the equation that we used to model the data. For this question, we would just need to substitute 20 for x since we want to know the price in 2020 (we have only used the last two digits of the year for the equation) while the answer to this would be the expected price.

y=-0.092+0.587(20)-0.026(20)^{2}
y=-0.092+11.740-10.400
y=1.248

The expected price in 2020 would be 1.248 units.
4 0
3 years ago
40 percent of what number equals 19.2
worty [1.4K]
You can get the number by dividing 19.2 by 0.40

The number is 19.2/0.40 = 48
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You can fly from Seattle to Boise for $137.50, from Boise to Witchita for $92.50 and from Witchita to Austin for $162.50. Use me
Vesnalui [34]
<span>We add all these numbers up. 137.50 +162.50+92.50= 392.50$ Use a cacl or by hand</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Of 585 samples of seafood purchased from various kinds of food stores in different regions of a country and genetically compared
Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

a) The 99% confidence interval is from 14.8% to 23.2%.

b) The confidence interval tells us that the true proportion of mislabeled is within 14.8% and 23.2%, with a 99% confidence. In other words, if we take samples of the same size, 99% of the samples will have a proportion within 0.148 and 0.232.

c) The confidence interval calculation take into account the sample size, so the width (or precision) of the interval depends on the sample size.

The only criticism that could be analyzed is to see if the sample is representative of the population.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We have to calculate a 99% confidence interval for the proportion.

The sample proportion is p=0.19.

 

The standard error of the proportion is:

\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.19*0.81}{585}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000263}=0.016

The critical z-value for a 99% confidence interval is z=2.576.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

MOE=z\cdot \sigma_p=2.576 \cdot 0.02=0.042

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

LL=p-z \cdot \sigma_p = 0.19-0.042=0.148\\\\UL=p+z \cdot \sigma_p = 0.19+0.042=0.232

The 99% confidence interval for the population proportion is (0.148, 0.232).

5 0
3 years ago
A larger number is five more than twice the smaller number their sum is 80 find the number
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

L= 5+2s

Step-by-step explanation:

Let L = the larger # and S = the smaller #.

A large # is 5 more than twice a smaller #.....This gives Eq 1) L = 5 + 2S

Their sum is 80...This gives Eq 2) L + S = 80.

Substitute Eq 1) into Eq 2), you get

L + S = 80

5 + 2S + S = 80

L = 5 + 2S

 

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the y-intercept of the line represented by the equation?<br><br><br><br> y = –6x – 1
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following are solutions to |x-1|= 5x + 2 ? Check all that apply.
    12·1 answer
  • HELP!!
    12·1 answer
  • What is the simplified form of the quantity y−squared minus y minus 12 over the quantity y−squared plus 8y plus 15?
    8·1 answer
  • A 100-inch board is cut into two pieces one peice is three times the length of the other find the length of the shorter peice
    6·1 answer
  • Write an equation of the line that passes through the given points.<br> question (-4, 3), (O, -10)
    14·1 answer
  • One way to divide decimal numbers is to use an equivalent expression.
    10·1 answer
  • If i was o dived 3 by 2 what woud it be
    6·2 answers
  • Paige rode her bike 4/5 mile. Megan rode her
    5·1 answer
  • I need help on this guys and plz help
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!