Answer:
Ozone
Explanation:
Ozone is considered a pollutant in the troposphere, but in the stratosphere it is essential to life on earth because it absorbs biologically harmful UV radiation. The mesosphere and the thermosphere are two additional atmospheric layers above the stratosphere.
A long, wet season results in additional earthworms in a robin habitat.
Explanation:
A long, wet season resulting in additional earthworms in a robin habitat will not lead to competition in an ecosystem or area.
Competition between organisms is the struggle for limited resources in the environment that are beneficial to all lives.
- Competition is usually driven by shortages and lack of resources to make life better in the ecosystem.
- When resources becomes depleted and are in limited amount organisms will begin to strive among on another to develop advantages that would make them top out.
- A long, wet season resulting in the introduction of additional earthworms in a robin habitat is not an example of competition.
- The earthworms available is a limiting factor and this has been circumvented by the introduction of more earthworms during the prolonged wet season.
learn more:
Competition brainly.com/question/8690489
#learnwithBrainly
The answer is confirmation bias. This is the tendency to look for evidence that will confirm ones hypothesis and ignoring anything else that does not lead to the hypothesis. In this situation confirmation bias is evident due to the fact that you look for anything that confirms your hypothesis and ignore anything else that does not point to drug abuse.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Matter can not be created or destroyed it can only change form. For example two Oxygen atoms can react with one hydrogen atom to form water but the oxygen and hydrogen is not destroyed,
<u>Answer</u>: Weber's/Weber-Fechner's law of just noticeable difference
This phychologoical law is used to quantify the perception of change for a given stimulus. The perceived change is proportional/constant ratio to the initial stimulus. Thus, it is the minimum amount of a stimulus intensity change that will produce noticeable variation in sensory experience.
As in the example, it has been shown that this law is not function very well for extremes of stimulation.
