Answer:
1.265
Explanation:
According to the situation, the solution of the beta of portfolio is as follows
Beta portfolio = (weightage of investment F × beta F) + (proportion of investment G ×beta G)
Beta protfolio = (0.5 × 1.08) + (0.5 × 1.45)
= 0.54 + 0.725
= 1.265
Hence, the beta of your portfolio is 1.265 by applying the above formula
Answer:
Accounts receivable $361,000 debit
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $560 debit
Net Sales $806,000 credit
0.4% of credit sales are uncollectible = 0.4% x $806,000 = $3,224
adjusting entry:
December 31, 202x
Dr Bad debt expense 3,224
Cr Allowance for doubtful accounts 3,224
Allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra asset account that reduces accounts receivable.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
Answer:
It is more convenient to produce the sails in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Riggs purchases sails at $ 250 each, but the company is considering using the excess capacity to manufacture the sails instead. The manufacturing cost per sail would be $ 100 for direct materials, $ 80 for direct labor, and $ 90 for overhead. The $ 90 overhead includes $ 78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity.
Because there will not be an increase in fixed costs, we will not have them into account.
Variable overhead= 90 - (78,000/1,200)= 25
Unitary variable cost= 100 + 80 + 25= 205
It is more convenient to produce the sails in house.