Answer:
get better at outdoor skills, do more exploration, go sky diving
Explanation:
out door skills for survival situations more exploration cause its a fun way to get in exercise and sky diving cause its cool
The answer to this question is: Quality
Answer:
$327,000
Explanation:
Stocks owned by the Gathering Company after repurchasing = $48,000
Cash paid for the purchase of land = $124,000
Amount of issued bonds payable = $375,000
Now,
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year would have been
= Amount of issued bonds payable - Stocks owned by the Gathering Company
= $375,000 - $48,000
= $327,000
Answer:
a.
WACC = 0.07961 or 7.961% rounded off to 7.96%
b.
After tax cost of debt = 0.0474 or 4.74%
Explanation:
a.
The weighted average cost of capital or WACC is the cost of a firm's capital structure. To calculate the WACC, we multiply the weight of each component of the capital structure by the cost of that component. The components of capital structure can be one or all of the following namely debt, preferred stock and common stock.
The formula for WACC is,
WACC = wD * rD * (1-tax rate) + wP * rP + wE * rE
Where,
- w represents the weight of each component
- r represents the cost of each component
- D, P and E represents debt, preferred stock and common stock respectively
WACC = 0.15 * 0.06 * (1 - 0.21) + 0.1 * 0.05 + 0.75 * 0.09
WACC = 0.07961 or 7.961% rounded off to 7.96%
b.
The after tax cost of debt is calculated by multiplying the cost of debt by (1 - tax rate) to adjust for the tax advantage provided by debt as interest payments on debt are tax deductible.
After tax cost of debt = 0.06 * (1 - 0.21)
After tax cost of debt = 0.0474 or 4.74%
Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.