The explanation for this is one of my favorite pieces of mathematical reasoning. First, let's thing about distance; what's the shortest distance between two points? <em>A straight line</em>. If we just drew a straight line between A and B, though, we'd be missing a crucial element of the original problem: we also need to pass through a point on the line (the "river"). Here's where the mathemagic comes in.
If we take the point B and <em>reflect it over the line</em>, creating the point B' (see picture 1), we can draw a line straight from A to B' that passes through a point on the line. Notice the symmetry here; the distance from the intersection point to B' is<em> the same as its distance to B</em>. So, if we reflect that segment back up, we'll have a path to B, and because it came from of the line segment AB', we know that it's <em>the shortest possible distance that includes a point on the line</em>.
If we apply this same process to our picture, we see that the line segment AB' crosses the line
at the point (1, 1)
I suck at math to I’m so so sorry Ask a tutor they will help
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
False.
Gross income is the total amount a person earns before any deductions are taken out.
1 mile is equal to 1.6 kilometers, so 8 miles (using a direct proportion) should be equal to 8 * 1.6 = 12.8 kilometers. The cyclist rides at 12.8 kilometers per hour. In four hours, the cyclist would have rode 12.8 * 4 = 48 + 3.2 = 51.2 kilometers.
1/4 - 1/2 = -1/4 but 1/2 - 1/4 = 1/4