1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mrs_skeptik [129]
3 years ago
7

Which factor was most directly related to the decline of the Hapsburg (Austria-Hungary)?

History
2 answers:
algol133 years ago
6 0

Answer:

nationalists sentiments from ethnic groups in the empire

Explanation:

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Nationalists sentiments from ethnic groups in the empire, is the right answer.

Explanation:

  • During the period between the 1500's and 1600's the Hapsburg in various internal as well as external issues such as internal political intrigues and war with the Turks.
  • Besides this, the Bubonic plague prevailed extensively in Vienna in the decade of 1680's.
  • The decade of 1800's saw the decease of the vast empire maintained by the Hapsburg.
  • However, there were many reasons for the decline of the Hapsburg empire but the Nationalists sentiments from ethnic groups in the empire were directly led to the decline of the empire.
You might be interested in
Write A one page essay on what Caused of the Civil War.
Hoochie [10]

Answer:

There were various causes for the civil war to take place. Some causes were cultural, while some were political, others were economic. The Union between the north and the south was split based on several important factors. Although the major cause was slavery, when such a thing entered into the political sphere, the problem came to the public view, which now required an immediate solution.

The economic differences between the south and the north were tremendous. The south was labour intensive because it largely depended on agriculture. It mainly produced cotton which required considerable human resources. On the other hand, the north had products of innovative industries and relied on the manufacturing-based economy. The north never required such huge amounts of the labour force. This difference contributed to the conflict.

The cultural differences between these two states were also huge. The north had a cosmopolitan society were life moved very fast. There was diversification in the infrastructure, and society was very modern. The south was the opposite in this respect. Here, the life of the people was slow-paced, and society was homogenous. The people in society were orthodox and loved their deep-rooted culture. Thus the roots of the civil war were largely colonial.

The two main notions that were in a tug of war was a radical abolition of slavery and pro-slavery. The north and the south were tied in conflict whether the states could decide what had to be done with slavery. William Lloyd Garrison was the voice of anti-slavery movement in the north, and he published “The Liberator”, which reached out to people far and wide. He was never in favour of compromise and founded the “New England Anti-Slavery Society” in the year 1832.

Frederick Douglass became another famous leader of this movement, who was born a slave but later escaped to America. He was born in Maryland, which was a pro-slavery nation. He was an advisor President Abraham Lincoln, who also propounded the anti-slavery movement. President Lincoln, who won the election in the year 1860, was the first Republican president. He sincerely fought for the abolition of slavery and made amendments to the constitution. The south was dissatisfied with these steps. Seven states in the south supported slavery whole-heartedly. These states that were pro-slavery formed the Confederate States of America. However, this body was not legitimate in the eyes of the north and Lincoln.

The idea of slavery had always kept the states divided. This war saw the victory of the north when president Lincoln made an executive order to free all the slaves. The Union Army, the largest organized army in America, captured all states, and finally, all the states were unified against slavery. This unification was through a common goal; to capture as many territories as possible and to make the slaves free of their bondage. This victory, however, came at a huge cost. This war saw a huge loss of lives, and the count reached almost 625000.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why did John lose Normandy
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

A rebellion broke out and John was ordered to appear before his overlord, Philip II of France. His failure to do so resulted in war. By 1206, John had lost Normandy, Anjou, Maine and parts of Poitou. These failures were a damaging blow to his prestige and he was determined to win them back.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Supporters of using the atomic bomb against Japan believed it would?
Gennadij [26K]
Make Japan surrender unconditionally.

Also that it would cost less American lives.

Those who supported the use of the atomic bomb believed that Japan would surrender after a large scale attack. They also believed that it would be better than an American invasion as it would result in less American casualties.

Hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were a settler in the American West, would you believe in Manifest Destiny? Why or why not? (please give at least 5 sente
Anastaziya [24]

<em>If I were a settler in the American West, I would think Manifest Destiny is believable. This is because it’s such a huge leap for the country as they are getting about 2x the land they already have. I would be so shocked about it, since America is getting more land for farming, mining, etc... This would improve my living situation and money if I were there, because more land means more room to make money. I would be so grateful for Manifest Destiny at the time.</em>

<em>✋ </em>

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following inventions helped farmers plant crops more quickly and efficiently?
ElenaW [278]
<span>the Seed drill

</span>

Thank you for letting me answer your question here on brainly. I like to help people as much as I can, so please let me now if my answers provide any help to  you. It means a lot to me to know that my questions help provide support to people in the community to need help. If you want extra help, you can PM me! I get  lot of PMs tough, so it might take a while to respond, my apologies. Thanks for reading this, and have a great day! ~  brainily user, Lillyxrose

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What the difference between a direct democracy and a representative democracy
    12·1 answer
  • Collaborators: Hiwi (Hilfswillige) in english: willing helpers (collaborators)
    10·1 answer
  • Why were the battles on the islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa significant to the Americans?
    7·1 answer
  • Select all major innovators of the late nineteenth or early twentieth century
    12·1 answer
  • Why does henry david thoreau use ethos in "resistance to civil government"?
    6·2 answers
  • What did Andrew Carnegie do?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the emancipation proclamation change the civil war?
    11·2 answers
  • What conflict was affecting Europe and Asia when the speech was given?
    11·1 answer
  • What tragedy occurs after the march on washington?
    5·1 answer
  • In what way was the Quaker view of women unusual in the 1600s?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!