Answer:
d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.
CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.
There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV
Explanation:
a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.
FALSE both method consider time value of money
b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital
FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable
.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.
FALSE IRR considers the time value of money
e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.
FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.
Answer:
I believe this would be D
Explanation:
I say that it is D because it is asking about what they would do under certain circumstances and or situations to see what they would say
Answer:
yup I think that tooooooo
Answer:
plot of risk-return combinations available by varying portfolio allocation between a risk-free rate and a risky portfolio
Explanation:
The capital allocation line (CAL) is called as the capital market line tha developed on the graph for all the expected combinations related to the risk-free and risk assets. In this, the graph presented the return investor that expected earn by assuming the particular level of risk along with the investment
Therefore the first option is correct
Answer:
combat unemployment?
Explanation:
That seems the likeliest answer compared to the others since national parks provide jobs.
