Answer:
b) Thank the representative and accept the offer to cover expenses of your participation.
Explanation:
Since the representative asked for your participation on an expert panel that will be held at an upcoming international professional conference. The representative offered to pay for travel and lodgings for you and a guest to the conference.
The response that be most effective for helping you to make an ethical decision is to first of all, thank the representative and accept the offer to cover expenses of your participation.
As a sign of gratitude, you should thank them for the honor and privilege bestowed on you to be a part of the panel.
Also, having them offering to pay your travel and lodging costs would help you channel your energy into preparing and equipping yourself with necessary information and knowledge about the conference.
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Trade between the nations will result in an increase in both competition and specialization.
When the trade among the nations increases then as a result competition increases because consumers have more number choices due to imported products from the other nations. This will increase the competition.
We know that the trade is largely based on the comparative advantage. The countries exporting the product in which it has a comparative advantage and importing the products in which it has a comparative disadvantage. This will increase the specialization in the production of certain goods.
Answer: No. the motion should not be granted because the business was done in Washington and hence, fall under Washington's jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Here is the complete question:
LG Electronics, Inc., and nineteen other foreign companies participated in the global market for cathode ray tube (CRT) products, which were integrated as components in consumer goods, including television sets. These goods were sold for many years in high volume in the United States, including the state of Washington. Later, the state filed a suit in a Washington state court against LG and the others, alleging a conspiracy to raise prices and set production levels in the market for CRTs in violation of a state consumer protection statute. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the suit for lack of personal jurisdiction. Should this motion be granted? Explain.
From the information that have been given in the question, we are informed that the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the suit for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The motion should not be granted because the business was done in Washington and hence, fall under Washington's jurisdiction. Therefore, the motion should not be dismissed.
Answer:
The element of an argument that moves the evidence to a conclusion is the reasoning. An argument is concluded only when the reason or the premises are valid.
Answer:
$40,160.
Explanation:
Total appraisal value = $55,500 + $50,200 + $19,300 = $125,000
Weight of land in the appraisal value = $50,200 ÷ $125,000 = 0.4016, or 40.16%
Amount to include in the accounting record = $100,000 × 40.16% = $40,160
