Question

Both error theorists and expressivists believe that... a. the point of moral judgments is to vent our emotions. b. no moral claims are true. c. some moral claims are true. d. moral judgments are attempts to describe the moral features of things.

Answer 1

Answer:

Morality is survival behavior above the individual level

Explanation:

Moral systems evolved among people as an aid to survival. Morality is survival behavior above the individual level.

Moral systems identify values and sort behaviors into good (virtues) and bad (vices) classes.

Moral systems prioritize values, sorting them in some order of importance.

Some moral systems work better than others in an absolute sense.

Some moral systems work better than others for particular groups of people, who find that the practice of certain moral systems aren't suited to their innate abilities and characteristics.

A proper moral system is a moral system that does what a moral system ought to do, namely, preserve the existence of the practitioner group.

In any proper moral system, the survival of the practitioner group is the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because no other value - truth, justice, freedom, properity - has any value at all to extinct peoples. Because only to something alive may anything else be good.

Truth is always in second place in value, after survival. Why? Because all third values depend on truth, just as they and truth depend on survival. Unless you first know what the truth is, you can't possibly discover what justice is. Unless you first know what the truth is, you can't be certain that you really are free.

These third values aren't bad things. Justice and freedom, for example, are good things. They are values. But they aren't the highest values: truth outranks them both. And survival outranks even truth.

Answer 2

Answer: Moral judgments are attempts to describe the moral features of things

Explanation:

Emotions play an important role when a person makes decisions and acts. While it is true that human beings are aware of what things should be done or not, according to society, this does not prevent that when choosing to do or say something emotions are not present.

A person will not act in the same way in a situation where someone is in danger and someone who has stolen since they are different situations where the mind has processed both events and assigns them the answers according to what the person conceives as right or wrong, about what you have to do or not.

To understand a little the complexity of the subject, moral judgment is defined as the ability of the human being to determine what is good and bad, what is fair or unfair in a given situation. A person if he sees someone committing a crime knows that it is wrong but, what happens when the real reasons are studied where the reasons include doing good, even knowing that the crime in the first place was wrong? Here come the emotions and how to be able to make a moral judgment.

The human being is an emotional being and is something that in certain situations can not control, so it is normal to find today a lot of content about emotional intelligence and how to manage it, that if even more than it is read there are times where the reactions produced by the body cannot be controlled instantly by the person due to how he interprets the situation at the moment.

A person can be a good citizen, someone who respects the laws and is aware of what is right or wrong, but this also does not prevent people from seeing in situations where emotions are the protagonists and have them decide that the moral point of view is not correct. It is important that people are aware of how to work emotions in a way that does not cloud their moral judgment, but rather that they can work in their favor.