1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wlad13 [49]
3 years ago
11

Wright a paragraph explainin the pros and cons of U.S. involvement in the Korean War. Which do you believe outweighs the other?

25 points
Social Studies
2 answers:
Dmitrij [34]3 years ago
7 0

Pros of US involvement in the Korean War:<span>
<span>1.) They helped fight communism.</span></span>

2.) Korea had more military defense and equipment as provided by the American government.

 

Cons of US involvement in the Korean War:

<span>1.)   </span>Thousands of lives were lost during the process. The casualties were inevitable given the great devastation done on the country.

<span>2.)   </span>Some other countries did not approve of the US involvement with the Korean War.

ki77a [65]3 years ago
4 0

Here is some information that will help

Pros

1) US shows that they are dedicated to the policy of containment: During this time, the US federal government adopted a policy of containment. This concept was all about stopping the spread of communism on an international scale. This helps to show why the US got involved in Korea, as they were trying to help South Korea from being taken over by a communist North Korea.

2) Helping South Korea resulted in the US getting a long term trade partner. This continues to this day, as we get many different products from South Korea (like Hyundai cars).

Cons

1) This was another foreign overseas war that many Americans did not think was important to the US. They saw this as an overreach of power.

2) Thousands of American lives would be lost fighting in the Korean War.

You might be interested in
Which of these changes involve forming or breaking chemical bonds?
ZanzabumX [31]
It would be burning and digesting.

Melting is just causing a status change, solid to liquid.

Cutting is just changing the shape of something.

Rusting doesn't change the actual substance.

Boiling changes the state as well.

It's only burning and digesting.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did president Andrew Jackson attack the bank of the United States
dangina [55]
Andrew Jackson was a major proponent of states' rights, and viewed the central banking system a taking advantage of the smaller states. This view was shared by many at the time.
4 0
3 years ago
After ratification of the fifteenth amendment..
Vladimir79 [104]

A. voting rights could not be denied based on race.

B. voting rights could not be denied based on gender.

C. poll taxes became illegal and unconstitutional.

D. literacy tests became illegal and unconstitutional.


The fifteenth amendment states that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of <em>race</em>, <em>color</em>, or <em>previous condition of servitude</em>."

There was no mention of gender, so voting for women hadn't been legalized until 1919, making B wrong.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help really quick plzzzz​
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

3rd from top

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
the government of india has,since independence ,taken several steps to put an end to casteism in india. do you think that discri
viva [34]
Actually, I only have an anecdotal evidence: from my personal experience.

I know a person who described her friendship with a person from a lower caste and how hard it was for the person from the smaller caste to get a better job precisely because everyone though that she is supposed to do only lower-tier jobs, as people of her caste "should".

The discrimination is still very much present: it's really hard to overcome a very old prejudice in people: people still perceive people of lower casts as "less worthy".

If this was not the caste, the regular support from the government for the lower castes (for example reserved seats at the universities) would be discontinued. (this is an example you can use: the government still thinks it's necessary to help the lower castes, if there was no more discrimination, they would have stopped). <span />
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the sooners get to Oklahoma by land, water, or both?
    5·1 answer
  • How do government regulators protect consumers?
    11·2 answers
  • Primary emphasis in the economic model of social responsibility is on
    13·2 answers
  • Maridell's Fashions has a debt that has been properly reported as a​ long-term liability up to the present year ​(2018​). Some o
    5·1 answer
  • In the _____ phase of the decision making process, managers test potential solutions “on paper.”
    7·1 answer
  • Which tang or song invention do you think was most important
    5·1 answer
  • 3.
    5·1 answer
  • What must one do to be considered an ARAB?
    7·1 answer
  • Today's Society Vs. Modern Society
    8·1 answer
  • Which amendment guarantees citizens a fair and speedy trial?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!