Chief Justice John Marshall stated last 1803 in the case of Marbury v. Madison that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
It implies that the judicial department applies the law and the understanding and interpretation therein would still be based on the designated person. If soever, the interpreter or representative in the judicial department would make any conflict with the intent, process, actual application of the law (the two representation of law), the courts would be the end to finalize the decision.
Hi,
I believe the answer is: A
Steering Committee: <span>a committee that decides on the priorities or order of business of an organization and manages the general course of its operations.
Standing Committee: </span><span>a permanent committee that meets regularly.
Ad Hoc Committee: A</span> committee<span> formed </span>ad hoc<span> to deal with the issue. Concerned or dealing with a specific subject, purpose, or end: The </span>ad hoc committee<span> disbanded after making its final report.
Special Committee:</span>A select or special committee of the United States Congress is a congressional committee appointed to perform a special function that is beyond the authority or capacity of a standing committee.
Look at the definitions. Think about it.
In the Hindu Society your karma would determine your reincarnation
<span>1.government consent may be granted only to ministers of religion.
2.</span><span> </span>Representatives<span> of Churches and religious associations</span>
