The problem with using John Gray's approach to resolving marital conflict is that the "Men from Mars, Women are from Venus" (1992) book <u>turns human psychology into stereotypes</u>. The fact that <u>men and women are not fundamentally different </u><u>was either ignored or underexamined</u> in Gray's approach and methodology.
According to Stephanie Coontz, imbalances of situated power in marriages are frequently mistaken or misinterpreted for "cultures" unique to each gender.
Coontz asserted that traditionalists who disagree with forward-thinking changes and progressive relationships are delusional because the family structure they hold dear is a passing relic.
Unlike Men from Mars, Women are from Venus, Coontz's writings have long asserted that the conventional or traditional nuclear families are frequently oppressive structure for women, that its decline, along with the rising acceptance of divorce, unmarried parenthood, domestic partnership, and LGBTQ unions, has been an empowering influence and must get public support.
Find out how many percent of the population, as the historian Stephanie Coontz points out, by 1978, thought that it was morally okay to be single and have children: brainly.com/question/15012453
#SPJ4
According to the drive-reduction theory, we are pushed by our needs and pulled by our incentives.
Drive reduction theory in learning theory is a sort of motivational hypothesis. Presented by Clark Frame in 1943, Drive reduction theory was the principal hypothesis for inspiration and motivation. As indicated by such scholars as Clark Structure and Kenneth Spence, drive reduction is a noteworthy reason for learning and conduct.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Pretty sure it’s C ... i hope this helps
