The Chicago Tribune is trying to say that companies cannot have both freedom and have control of other companies.
Answer:
Short answer no Long answer - no, data collection is essential to the functioning of society
Explanation:
Short answer explanation - All data collection is not unethical because data collection is too broad of a subject to make a claim to whether or not it as a whole is ethical or not. Simple example - is it unethical for a primary grade student to collect data about ice melting for her science experiment? - obviously not because she is imposing harm to no one by doing so, and only furthering her knowledge.
Longer answer - (hope this helps you form a thesis) - While certain types of data collection can certainly be considered unethical, there are many types of data collection that are vital to modern society as a whole. All intellectual works of mathematics, philosophy, and science, are essentially data collection. Deriving mathematics as an example, mathematics is simply a way of explaining the technical occurrences in our world. The inner workings and formulas of math all come from observations of the natural world, and documentation of those observations. Documentation of observations is data collection - - -- - - so essentially not all data collection is bad.
Hope this helps
Compared to middle-aged adults, elderly people are LESS likely to experience intensely positive emotions and LESS likely to experience intensely negative emotions.
Their maturity level pretty much play a very huge part on this.<span />
Answer:
Illinois v. Gates
Explanation:
Illinois v. Gates was a case that involved the guidelines set by the fourth amendment of the US Constitution. This case arose when the Illinois police received a complaint about the existence of a possible couple of drug traffickers who worked in the illegal distribution of drugs and weapons. and find drugs and weapons that were sold illegally. Despite the presence of a search mantle, the Illinois court found the police action illegal.
In this case, the Court concluded that it is more prudent to abandon the "double test" established by the decisions of Aguilar and Spinelli; in its place, the Court reaffirmed the "totality of circumstances" test that traditionally informed determinations of probable causes.