What are the provisions of The Federalist Papers: Number 84?
These provisions are the stipulations in the U.S.'s Constitution, which are in favor of particular privileges and rights of the people. These were also analized in Alexander Halminton's essay: The Federalist Papers Number 84, also titled as "Certain General and Miscellaneois Objections to the Constitution Considered and Answered".
List of 5 of the provisions of The Federalist Papers: Number 84:
Article 1, section 3, clause 7: Judgment in cases on impeachment shall not extend further than to removal fromm office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States; but the partly convicted shall, nevertheless, be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, accordint to law.
Article 1, section 9, clause 2: The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shalll not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
Article 1, section 9, clause 3: No bill of attainder or ex-post-facto law shall be passed.
Article 1, section 9, clause 7: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Article 3, section 2, clause 3: The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
What are the provisions of bills of rights?
The provisions of Bills of Right are stipulations in favor of the privileges, reservations of rights and liberties to the individuals of the U.S., stated in its Constitution.
List of 5 of the provisions of the Bill of Rights:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the securty of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, agains unteasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the rights of trial by jury shall be presevered, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Cour of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Excessive bail shall not be rquired, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
A learned association between a response and a stimulus is to operant conditioning as a learned association between two stimuli is to classical conditioning(is learning through association whereby a conditioned stimulus becomes associated with an unrelated unconditioned stimulus in order to produce a behavioral response known as a conditioned response )
<u>The consequences of life tenure for federal judges:</u>
Life tenure for federal judges was implemented for an extraordinarily vital purpose.
It protects the judges from the 'political stress' which might come with periodic liability to an 'electorate'.
But importantly, this ideal does not demand life tenure. Appointment without possibility of renewal for a fixed term of years would fulfill the same purpose.
But ironically this life tenure has further magnified political divisions.
So, this has failed to completely implement the judicial independence that the lifetime appointment of a federal judge had hoped to serve.
Four cases that support affirmative action are Swann v
Charlotte-Mecklenberg County Schools, Brown v Board of Education, Grutter v
Baller, and United Steelworkers of America v Weber. Meanwhile four cases that
oppose affirmative action are Regents of the University of California v. Bakke,
Adarand Constructors v. Pena, Gutter vs. Bollinger, and Parenting involved in
community schools v Seattle school district.
Answer: This is a act against humanity with he Venezuelan world and Nicolas Maduro bad decisions as a president.
An act against humanity happened in Venezuela. Nicolas Maduro created a climate of terror in order to repress opposition to his presidency and the international community. Protestants are in the streets with guns destroying the city. Nicolas Maduro has made Venezuela a savage country and made himself a bad president. Protestants called for new elections and more than 100 people were killed in clashes with securities forces. The government of Venezuela is letting people destroy the country and act against humanity.
