Answer:
The correct answer is letter b. social loafing.
Explanation:
In social psychology, the term social loafing describes a phenomenon that takes place when individuals work in a group instead of on their own. Social loafing is the tendency people show to exert less effort when working with others. This phenomenon explains why sometimes groups are less efficient and less productive than if the individuals were to work on their own and be responsible for their own productivity. That is the case with Michelle. Now that the group is larger, she is making less effort, being "content to sit back and let others do the work".
Answer:
The question above represents an example of a case.
Explanation:
The question above shows an example of a case. One case is a judicial process, where a situation of discrepancy has been established between two people, two entities, or between entities and people (as shown in the question above), where it will be necessary to review laws so that a judge can make decisions around this discrepancy, allowing the injured to be compensated.
3%= 0.03
So 0.03x200
=6
So the answer is D
That the state courts might make opposite rulings in the same type of course. Hope this is correct
