According to the <u>Information processing</u> <u>model</u>, by the age of 26, her memory of that day is a blending of the original memory, what others told her, and what she has imagined since then.
This is because the Information processing model stated that in long-term memory, individuals passively hold memory.
This is evident in the scenario described here, where 20 years later, Cassandra passively holds the memory of what originally happened that day by blending her original memory with what others told her and what she has imagined since then.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the "Information Processing Model."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/6392847
After Mendel's work was rediscovered, scientists named as Hardy and Weinberg explained why a population doesn't always come to be composed solely of individuals with the dominant phenotype.
<h3>What is a Scientist?</h3>
A person who studies science and has natural expertise based on interest and knowledge about the field is referred to as a scientist. This scientist will perform various experiments and do research.
Hardy and Weinberg explained about the population and why it does not come to be as individuals with the dominant phenotype. There cannot be any migration from or into a population for it to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Learn more about Scientists, here:
brainly.com/question/12965344
#SPJ4
Answer:
Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation:
Intergenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status between different generations within the same family, this type of mobility permits new generations to have better opportunities than the ones that their ancestors had and change their social status.
In this example Carlos' grandfather was an agricultural worker, Carlos' father worked as a clerk and because of their efforts, Carlos' is now able to graduate from college and medical school. We can see how Carlos' family has gone through changes in social status thanks to the efforts and opportunities they created.
Thus, this is an example of intergenerational mobility.
Calvin's professor can conclude that Calvin has been an observational kid.
Explanation:
The observation Calvin makes is a rather arbitrary one but one that can invite broader concern nonetheless.
Some kids start bobbing their heads and raising them before they can ever turn while the other develop these skills in the opposite order.
It would remain to be seen if Calvin would think something can be inferred from this otherwise rather standalone observation of things or not as there may be a study on how far this can be taken in child psychology.
At any rate, he is an observational student and the professor can put that to use.
The answer is that, "the given statement is true".
We can define a phreak as somebody who breaks into the phone network wrongfully, regularly to make free long-remove telephone calls or to tap telephone lines. The term is currently in some cases used to incorporate any individual who breaks or endeavors to break the security of any system.
