Answer: B
Robert is in the Evaluation of alternatives stage of the buyer decision process.
Explanation:
The various stages which consumers go through when they are considering a purchase are as follows:
Problem or need recognition , Information search
, Evaluation of alternatives
, Purchase
, Post-purchase behavior
Evaluation of alternatives is the third stage in the Consumer Buying Decision process. In this stage, the consumers evaluate all their options based on the attributes of the products which is capable of delivering the benefit/ satisfaction that the consumer intends to get. Comparing the products (i.e different brands of products that is capable of satisfying the consumer needs), shows the alternatives being considered by consumers during the problem-solving process.
Therefore Robert, trying to choose between : Waterbags for Roadies, Supertanker Hydropacks, and Fast Water is in the stage of Evaluation of alternatives stage. Therefore the answer is B
Answer:
Correct option is C
Explanation:
Increase in \alpha decreases πt - π(t-1) which shows decrease in natural rate of unemployment.
Phillips bend clarifies the connection between expansion rate and joblessness rate. As indicated by it there is a reverse connection between the joblessness rate and swelling rate. It implies there is an exchange off among expansion and joblessness rate.
The strategy ramifications of Phillips bend is that administration can't lessen swelling and joblessness together. It joblessness decreases, at that point the economy must acknowledge higher expansion. Then again, on the off chance that economy lessens expansion, at that point it must acknowledge higher joblessness.
When there is synchronous change in the swelling rate and joblessness rate then this is an instance of development along the short-run Phillips bend.
Then again, when either joblessness rate or swelling rate stays unaltered while different changes then it prompts moving of short-run Phillips bend.
Answer:
The accounting profit is $30,000.
Explanation:
The implicit cost of running the restaurant is the opportunity cost of giving up a salary of $40,000 per year working as a chef.
The revenue earned from the restaurant is $100,000.
The explicit costs is
= $50,000 + $20,000
= $70,000
An accountant will consider only the accounting cost or explicit cost in the calculation of profits.
Accounting profit
= Total revenue - Explicit costs
= $100,000 - $70,000
= $30,000
Answer: The secondary source on a topic may be biased because the information is translated and the text and information could be altered
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: False
Explanation:
