The interest per year for $5,000 to become $9,110 after 30 years is 2.02% compounded continuously.
Answer: 1. 18 times
2. Park is in better position
Explanation:
1. Times interest earned is a financial ratio that measures interest coverage. It's essentially to check if a company can pay it's debt payments and is calculated by either EBIT or EBITDA divided by the total interest expense. The higher the better and anything above 2.5 times is usually considered.
Calculating would therefore be,
= $6,120,000 /$340,000
= 18 times.
2. As mentioned in the first answer, for the Times interest earned, the higher it is, the more favourable it is. So Park Company will be considered safer and are most definitely in a better or worse position than its competitor to make interest payments if the economy turns bad. The fact that theirs is 18 means that they can pay off their interest expense 5 times more than their competitor who can only repay 12 times.
If you need any clarification do comment.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
LIFO ending inventory $ 544.00
Weighted average: $ 565.44
FIFO ending invetory: $ 590.00
Explanation:
weighted-average:
1,449 / 41 = 35,34
Ending Inventory
16 x 35.34
LIFo we pick the first 16 units as the latest were sold:
8 units at $ 33 = $ 264
8 units at $ 35 = $ 280
Total ending inventory $ 544
FIFo we pick the last as the first one are the first being sold
15 units at 37 = 555
1 unit at 35 = 35
total ending 590
Answer:
$5 million
Explanation:
If we follow the Coase Theorem, the appropriate solution to this case should be obtained regardless of initial rights. In this case, the factory saves $5 million to the producer, but it costs $10 million to Boston residents. if Boston residents pay $5 million or more to the factory owner, then both would benefit. Boston residents will gain $10 - $5 = $5 million, as well as the factory owner.
