All categories

2 years ago

The above proof shows that the sum of an irrational and rational number is always____. Explain

Mathematics

2 answers:

dolphi86 [110]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

B) irrational. Since an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.

Step-by-step explanation:

Triss [41]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

This answer will always irrational because for example if have 2 square root 3+4 then it would be irrational if you add them together because you wouldn’t be able to put that in a fraction

You might be interested in

Does the set {t, t Int} form a fundamental set of solutions for t^2y" -- ty' +y = 0?

Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a Cauchy Euler's equation

$t^2y''-ty'+y=0$ where t is not equal to zero

We are given that two solutions of given Cauchy Euler's equation are t,t ln t

We have to find the solutions are independent or dependent.

To find the solutions are independent or dependent we use wronskain

$w(x)=\begin{vmatrix}y_1&y_2\\y'_1&y'_2\end{vmatrix}$

If wrosnkian is not equal to zero then solutions are dependent and if wronskian is zero then the set of solution is independent.

Let $y_1=t,y_2=t ln t$

$y'_1=1,y'_2=lnt+1$

$w(x)=\begin{vmatrix}t&t lnt\\1&lnt+1\end{vmatrix}$

$w(x)=t(lnt+1)-tlnt=tlnt+t-tlnt=t$ where t is not equal to zero.

Hence,the wronskian is not equal to zero .Therefore, the set of solutions is independent.

Hence, the set {t , tln t} form a fundamental set of solutions for given equation.

6 0

3 years ago

Which fraction is equivalent to 2/6?

Lunna [17]

Answer:

$\frac{1}{3}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{2}{6}$ simplified is $\frac{1}{3}$

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write an expression for the perimeter of the house use the work you completed in parts A and B to guide you (the numbers in the

Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

The total length of Valerie’s walls is (2.5 × 4) + (21.25 × 3) + 32.

The total length of Seth’s walls is 3.5 + (22.75 × 2) + 58.

To find the expression for the perimeter of the house, add Valerie’s expression to Seth’s:

(2.5 × 4) + (21.25 × 3) + 32 + 3.5 + (22.75 × 2) + 58.

Step-by-step explanation:

its the platho answer so change it a bit

8 0

2 years ago

The answer to the problem

Kipish [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the problem is, there is no problem ;)

4 0

3 years ago

Let x denote the lifetime of a mcchine component with an exponential distribution. The mean time for the component failure is 25

aliina [53]

Answer:

0.1353 = 13.53% probability that the lifetime exceeds the mean time by more than 1 standard deviations

Step-by-step explanation:

Exponential distribution:

The exponential probability distribution, with mean m, is described by the following equation:

$f(x) = \mu e^{-\mu x}$

In which $\mu = \frac{1}{m}$ is the decay parameter.

The probability that x is lower or equal to a is given by:

$P(X \leq x) = \int\limits^a_0 {f(x)} \, dx$

Which has the following solution:

$P(X \leq x) = 1 - e^{-\mu x}$

The probability of finding a value higher than x is:

$P(X > x) = 1 - P(X \leq x) = 1 - (1 - e^{-\mu x}) = e^{-\mu x}$

The mean time for the component failure is 2500 hours.

This means that $m = \frac{2500}, \mu = \frac{1}{2500} = 0.0004$

What is the probability that the lifetime exceeds the mean time by more than 1 standard deviations?

The standard deviation of the exponential distribution is the same as the mean, so this is P(X > 5000).

$P(X > x) = e^{-0.0004*5000} = 0.1353$

0.1353 = 13.53% probability that the lifetime exceeds the mean time by more than 1 standard deviations

4 0

2 years ago