Answer:
A. NPV for A= $61,658.06
NPV for B = $25,006.15
B. 1.36
1.17
Project A
Explanation:
Net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calcuated using a financial calculator
for project A :
Cash flow in
Year 0 = $(172,325)
Year 1 41,000
Year 2 47,000
Year 3 85,295
Year 4 86,400
Year 5 56,000
I = 10%
NPV = $61,658.06
for project B
year 0 = $ (145,960)
Cash flow in
Year 1 27,000
Year 2 52,000
Year 3 50,000
Year 4 71,000
Year 5 28,000
I = 10%
NPV = $25,006.15
profitability index = 1 + NPV / Initial investment
for project A, PI = $61,658.06 / 172,325 = 1.36
For project B, PI = $25,006.15 / 145,960 = 1.17
The project with the greater NPV and PI should be chosen. this is project A.
To find the NPV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
In purely competitive firms, there are many buyers and sellers that no single buyer or seller can influence the price of goods. They accept the price set by the market conditions which depend on the market supply and demand. Firms in this market are price-takers.
In monopolistic firm, no one is competing against him. He is the only one in the industry. He is the only seller while buyers are many. In most cases, buyers do not have alternative than to buy the product. Because of this, the firm in monopoly sets its price. He is a price-maker.
Based on financial and accounting principles, the general message of the full disclosure principle is that "<u>the lack of evidence that something resides in a favored category will often suggest that it belongs to a less favored one."</u>
This is because the full disclosure principle state that all information should be documented in a company or individual financial statements which are believed to affect a reader's knowledge of that specific financial statement.
This ensures that every party that needs to access the financial statements under concern should fully understand them without missing any form of information.
Otherwise, any missing link or information will be ruled in favor of the less favored party in a legal situation.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24280368
Answer:
c. Division 1 should continue to do business with Division 2 because Division 1's variable cost per part is only $18.
Explanation:
Since the variable cost per part is only $18 and Division 1 sells to Division 2 at $25, it is in the company's overall interest that business should continue between the two divisions.
The cost of getting the part from outside is $26. This will incur more cost to the company and create excess capacity for Division 1.
Fixed costs are not relevant in making a decision of this nature. The costs would be incurred irrespective of the decision made. They are therefore irrelevant. The relevant cost is the variable cost of $18 per unit. It should be the focus of the decision, including the possibility of excess capacity for Division 1.
Answers: i*r*t = 2000*1*4%=80
2000+80=
$2080.00