Answer: Backtranslation
Explanation:
Back translation is the process of interpreting a document or retranslating a document that had been translated into another language back to its main original language.
Since the researchers are planning to use English and French versions of the survey, then in the preparation of the survey, they should use backtranslation.
Answer:
The formula for RNOA is net income divided by net operating assets.
29,068/354,414= 8.2%
Explanation:
Answer:
$29.83
Explanation:
This question requires application of dividend discount model, according to which current value of share is present value of dividends expected in future.
where V2 is the terminal value, present value of dividends growing at constant growth rate,
V2 = Div3 ÷ (r - g)
Div3 = $2.24 × (1 + 2.8%)
= $2.30272
V2 = $2.30272 ÷ (0.102 - 0.028)
= $2.30272 ÷ 0.074
= $31.12
= 2.36 + 1.84 + 25.63
= $29.83
C.
A Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) is an OTC rate derivative in which the buyer will pay or receive at maturity the difference between a fixed rate and a reference interest rate applied onto either a borrowing or lending (the notional is never exchanged), for a specific period of time.
Answer:
1. The difference between : Moral Hazard
<u>Intentions </u> - An individual is aware of what he is doing and intentionally goes for the risk because he knows he is covered and will gain as the payment or any related cost to sustaining an injury or a loss will not be paid by him but will be paid for by the insurance as it covered. Actions are intentional and potential risks increases as the behavior becomes irresponsible and careless.
Morale Hazard
<u>Intentions </u> - An individual's behavior unintentionally changes and so does the attitude toward the insured item changes. Here an individual losses responsibility unintentionally and unconsciously acts reckless as they know know it is insured.
main difference are intentions
Moral Hazard is an important concept to insurance companies because Insurance companies need to know the intentions of the person, insurance is not for gain but for cover against the possibility of a risk and the person insured should not seek for the risk and actually drive the risk or be the cause of the risk occurring.
2. No, I do not think it should be eliminate. it is obvious that moral hazard does in a way seem like it is encouraging bad behavior but risks must be insured. The insurance companies should enforce some claim charges for this kind of insurance.
Explanation:
