Answer:
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Explanation:
Given Cash outflow = $10 million
Provided cash inflows as follows:
Particulars Good condition Moderate condition Bad Condition
Probability 30% 40% 30%
Cash flow $9 million $4 million $1 million
Average expected cash flow each year = ($9 million X 30 %) + ($4 million X 40%) + ($1 million X 30%) = $2.7 million + $1.6 million + $0.3 million = $4.6 million
Three year expected cash flow = ($4.6 million each year X 3) - $10 million = $13.8 million - $10 million = $3.8 million
While calculating NPV we will use Present Value Annuity Factor (PVAF) @12% for 3 years = 
NPV = PV of inflows - PV of Outflows = $4.6 million X 2.402 - $10 million = $11.0492 million - $10 million = $1.0492 million
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Answer:
Choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
Explanation:
The analysis showing the incremental revenues,costs and net income of alternative A and B is shown below:
Alternative A Alternative B Difference between A&B
Revenues $146,100 $185,900 $39800
Costs ($104,400) ($127,100) ($22700
)
Net income $41,700 $58,800 $17,100
Alternative B records a higher net income compared to Alternative A,hence choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
r
When we're trying to determine a genetic foundation for intelligence and criminality we're allowing for the possibility of genetic determinism being a true thing which we obviously know it's not. For that reason it might be problematic to conclude anything about a genetic diagnosis for either of those considering there are always multiple variables which are at play.
He should consider exporting since it's a fairly small company.
Explanation:
The manufacturer doesn't have enough knowledge of the country it is expanding it market to and it doesn't have much experience since it is a small company so exporting it's products will push costs such as shipping to the customer which will relief if from making exchange losses and other expenses.
#learnwithbrainly
Answer:
Yes, it is a binding contract.
Explanation:
A contract is a legal binding agreement between two or more parties at the court of law. The agreement could be in terms of money, services, right or duties between the parties involved.
Since a consent has been reached between the two parties before the judge, Charles would pay the sum in the stipulated manner. The acceptance of the offer of payment by Sandra made it a binding contract for Charles, so he is bound by this service until he pays the full amount to Sandra.
