Answer:
Sorry this is late and I think this is right.
They are both parallel, they have the same slope, and do <em>not </em>intersect. If you were to draw a slope out for it, you would find this to be true.
For example: Say the question called for you to explain why there aren't any solutions to these system of inequalities:
<em>y < - 1/2x -3</em>
<em>y > 1/2x + 2</em>
<em>y= -x/2 -3</em> and <em>y= -x/2 + 2 </em>have the same exact slope, are parallel, and never intersect. The first line is 5 units below the second line when x = 0. Because the lines are parallel, it is always below the second line. The solutions of y < - x/2 -3 are the points in the plane below the first line. The solutions of y > 1/2 + 2 are points above the second line.
I hope this helps you. Good luck on whatever you're working on and stay safe! Please let me know if this helped you or didn't.
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it will help good luck
Answer:
jennifer will get alot of carrots
Step-by-step explanation: good eyesight
Strange question, as normally we would not calculate the "area of the tire." A tire has a cross-sectional area, true, but we don't know the outside radius of the tire when it's mounted on the wheel.
We could certainly calculate the area of a circle with radius 8 inches; it's
A = πr^2, or (here) A = π (8 in)^2 = 64π in^2.
The circumference of the wheel (of radius 8 in) is C = 2π*r, or 16π in.
The numerical difference between 64π and 16π is 48π; this makes no sense because we cannot compare area (in^2) to length (in).
If possible, discuss this situatio with your teacher.
