Answer:
If they were citizens they could participate lol
Explanation:
Answer:
Universities.
Explanation:
In medieval times, higher learning institutions began to become more important, with scholars desirous of better education attending schools or universities to attain such knowledge. These universities would excel in the study of arts, medicine, law, or medicine.
These universities were established in the kingdom of Italy and then spread to England, Portugal, and Spain. Initially, these universities would be based on Catholic schools but then evolve to a much wider scope of 'education'. The first universities were more concerned with philosophical studies, between students and masters, and 'classes' taken in big stadiums or halls. Later on, many modern universities would be established with western style organizational forms.
Answer:
The simple answer is that the Sun is the closest star to Earth, about 93 million miles away. But that might not answer your question. Outside of our Sun, our system's nearest neighbor is Alpha Centauri. ... Alpha Centauri A and B are two bright, closely orbiting stars with a distant, dim companion named Proxima Centauri
Explanation:
Answer:
D. The Federal Reserve Bank can provide a short-term loan to banks to prevent them from running out of money
Explanation:
(apex)
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
