Answer:
Before accepting brain imaging studies, the inquiries that I would pose before believing these discoveries to be legitimate are:
Did the investigation show up in a peer-reviewed journal?
peer-reviewed implies presenting the exploration papers to different specialists for an alternate and free audit before accepting it. It is perhaps the most ideal way of finding out the reality of the study and how right the outcomes are. It is in every case great to go for the subsequent feeling.
How large was the sample?
Clearly more the members in an examination, progressively substantial are its outcomes. This is to learn that there were a serious measure of individuals whose brain were examined.
Did the scientists control for key contrasts?
Assorted variety or sex parity ought to be there while contemplating the examples. One shows signs of improvement result when the investigation of populace is as homogenous as conceivable in light of the fact that it permits the specialists to reduce or diminish the quantity of contrasts that may influence the examination or result.
Answer:
Rotifera- Microscopic animals with distinct head, neck, trunk, and foot
Bryozoa- Have a lophophore for feeding
Arthropoda- Have jointed appendages
Playthelminthes- Vibrantly colored flat-structured worms
Explanation:
Answer:
d is the answer to this question
Okay. The destruction of tundra vegetation will not really freeze the soil or deepen the active zone much. Therefore, A and C are eliminated. The destruction of the vegetation can actually melt permafrost, which contributes to global warming. The answer is D.
Answer:
that means they are not a prey to any animal
