Answer:
effective rate of protection for the domestic is 46 %
Explanation:
given data
imposition = 20 percent
cost of material inputs = $100 per unit
world price = $175 per unit
solution
we get here Extra amount that is
Extra amount = world price × tariff mean ........................ 1
Extra amount = $175 × $20%
Extra amount = $35
and
So we get effective rate of protection for the domestic is
effective rate of protection = 35 ÷ (175-100)
effective rate of protection = 46 %
The environment often reflects or reinforces genetic differences; that is, certain genetic and environmental influences tend to act in the same direction. This tendency is called Genotype-environment correlation.
<h3>
Genotype-environment correlation</h3>
- When a person chooses surroundings based on traits that are impacted by genetics, genetic-environment correlation arises. For instance, highly intelligent students may choose classes that are harder, which broadens their knowledge even more.
- Research on environmental risk and protective factors has significant challenges because of the gene-environment interaction. Numerous studies in the social sciences have demonstrated that different surroundings are related to psychological characteristics, i.e., that exposure to a particular environment element is related to a particular behavior.
- These connections, however, do not imply that being exposed to that environment truly causes the feature. Every statistics curriculum in the social sciences teaches the fundamental principle that correlation does not inevitably imply causation.
To learn more about gene-environment interaction refer to:
brainly.com/question/14443482
#SPJ4
I can't submit the answer!!! because it says "Rude please change it!"
Answer:
José Antonio Navarro, José Francisco Ruiz, and Lorenzo de Zavala
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden is the first of many cases that has sought to define the role of Congress in regulating commerce, and the degree to which the federal government can use the Commerce Clause to legislate business practices.
The decision in Fletcher v. Peck expanded the parameters of judicial review, as it marked the first time the Supreme Court struck down a state law as unconstitutional.
