Answer:
<em>In economics, economic equilibrium is a situation in which economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change.</em>
<em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em>
Answer:
Protista and fungi are lower level organisms, which are classified into the kingdom Protista and Fungi, respectively. Protists are mostly unicellular organisms, whereas the fungi are mostly multicellular organisms. ... Protists can be either heterotrophs or autotrophs. Fungi contain a cell wall, which is made up of chitin.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you out and get a good score!
<u><em>Source is from my own knowledge</em></u>
Answer:
<h2>Spread throughout the organisation</h2>
Explanation:
The organisations in which mid and lower-level managers make most of the decisions is called decentralised organisation. In it higher authority is given to workers and functionaries. While in the centralised organisations all the decisions are made by the manager at the top.
All organisations are decentralised to some extent. However the extent of decentralisation differ from organisation to organisation. In strongly centralised organisations although the authority is delegated to lower-level managers they do not have much freedom to make decisions.
Answer:
The argument uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
<span>The Nobles made King John sign the document known as the Magna Carta, meaning Great Charter. This changed some certain rights. Before, the king could put anyone in jail without a cause or reason. But on the Magna Carta, there was the Habeas Corpus, which meant you have to have a reason to keep a person in jail. One of the more important laws was that even the King had to obey the law. This idea became one of the basic principles of English Government. - I hope this helps :)</span>
