Answer:b. enlightened self-interest school
Explanation:
Enlightened self-interest can be defined as the ability of understanding and trusting that as we impact other people's lives positives our lives will also be impacted positively to some extent. As the saying which says "what goes around comes around " simple put. Even though our action may be driven by internal desires to acquire personal satisfaction but under the enlightened self-interest we also look for the needs of others to ensure their wellbeing; it is a two way street everyone benefits.
Devoting ourselves to improving other people lives gives us that satisfaction and the drive to keep going.
It is a fulfilling act that leaves an individual content with their lives for having played a role that changes someone else's live for good.
If you need to navigate from the launchpad to to place that would help you get a refresher on what the duplicate command does, go to Help Docs.
<h3>What are Help Docs?</h3>
Help Docs are a utility in your browser that tell you more about tools that you don't have much information about. They tell you about different commands such as the DUPLICATE command and all you need to do is to search for the command and the information will be presented to you.
Community will not help you find out more about the DUPLICATE command directly because it involves talking to others in the community. Tech Support is only helpful if you have a problem with the ACL Analytics tool.
Options for this question are:
- Community
- Tech Support
- Help Docs
Find out more on ACL Analytics at brainly.com/question/14464816
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
The answer is true. its a litttle higher
