Answer:They are equivalent, if that's what your trying to find out.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Marty got 70 and then Joe earned 3 times it
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The solution to this question can be defined as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
In choice a:
Both children between 5 and 15 years old and 160 years old are also the populations of interest, and Kids from 5 to 15 years of age.
In choice b:
These findings could be compared like we do not know whether the groups were randomly selected, and the allocation is still not random; there could be no casual conclusion because the statement is valid even With sample research, and after randomization, filtering, and testing of 160 specimens (instruction vs no-instruction) Its analysis can be common to the community and replicated. There could be explanatory relations generated by experimental research. This analysis is observational and can therefore be used Causal relationships are established.gggg
<span>The
missing pieces strategy is another method to compare two fractions. To tell
which number is larger, you ned to see which one is missing less. For example
you have ¾ versus 4/5. Each of these fraction needs 1 to complete the whole. You
need to subtract the numerator with one to compare them. For ¾ we have ¼ and
for 4/5 we have 1/5. You know that if you complete 4/5 you will get 5 and for ¾
you will get 4. You know that 5 is greater than four. Therefore, 4/5 is larger
than ¾.</span>
Answer:
A. An Algebraic Expression
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have no equal sign in the problem, we know that it is an expression. An equation has an equal sign and another value so we can simplify to find the value of whatever variable we are working with. We also know that it is not anything numerical because we are working with variables. With this information we will see that the correct answer is A.
Best of Luck!
