The verb in this sentence is "talked" because it's an action.
Answer:
Explanation:
When New York State recently marked the 100th anniversary of its passage of women’s right to vote, I ought to have joined the celebrations enthusiastically. Not only have I spent 20 years teaching women’s history, but last year’s Women’s March in Washington, D.C. was one of the most energizing experiences of my life. Like thousands of others inspired by the experience, I jumped into electoral politics, and with the help of many new friends, I took the oath of office as a Dutchess County, New York legislator at the start of 2018.
So why do women’s suffrage anniversaries make me yawn? Because suffrage—which still dominates our historical narrative of American women’s rights—captures such a small part of what women need to celebrate and work for. And it isn’t just commemorative events. Textbooks and popular histories alike frequently describe a “battle for the ballot” that allegedly began with the famous 1848 convention at Seneca Falls and ended in 1920 with adoption of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For the long era in between, authors have treated “women’s rights” and “suffrage” as nearly synonymous terms. For a historian, women’s suffrage is the equivalent of the Eagles’ “Hotel California”: a song you loved the first few times you first heard it, until you realized it was hopelessly overplayed.
A closer look at Seneca Falls shows how little attention the participants actually focused on suffrage. Only one of their 11 resolutions referred to “the sacred right to the elective franchise.” The Declaration of Sentiments, written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and modeled on the U.S. Declaration of Independence, protested women’s lack of access to higher education, the professions and “nearly all the profitable employments,” observing that most women who worked for wages received “but scanty remuneration.
A mother is awoken in the night by a clanging doorbell and flashing lights.
Answer:
He was describing the California dream which he referred to as a paradox of expectations.
He pointed out that the expectations of millions of people who migrate into California was raise as a result of the promises of the California Dream. He noted that these people hope that they will have a better life in California than the lives they had in their past.
Extensive writing is formal writing written with defined structures and stylistic conventions to be aesthetically pleasant for readers; this is because reflexive writing is formal and its main focus is to communicate information; in other words, reflexive writing is meant to share certain kind of information clearly and effectively. Reflexive writing, on the other hand, is personal and much more flexible in terms of style and structures, which makes it more difficult to master. Reflexive writing focus on the toughs an emotions of the author rather than the form. An author that is able to use reflexive writing defectively, is an author that has a deeper connection with their writing, which takes practice and time.
We can conclude that the correct answer is: Reflexive writing is used by accomplished writers, while extensive writing is used by beginning writers.
