1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mila [183]
3 years ago
9

What's the answer??​

History
1 answer:
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which colony were were Catholics and protestants welcome in ,but non-christians could be executed
ladessa [460]

Maryland.

In 1649 passed an act of toleration with all the Catholic church and protestant churches, but this also gave death penalty to every person that did not believe in Jesus. At that time Maryland was a very important colony and was one of the first places to have religion tolerance, setting an example for the years to come.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the settlers looking for
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

It depends on the settlers you're referring to :)

but overall, when you look at most non-prehistoric settlements in history, most are motivated by power and/or money (which essentially means power in today's world.) for example, many coming to the Americas were in search of slaves (which gave them a position of power) and riches. (which when reported back to the mother country, would praise them, giving them power).  

for example, In the late 1400s, Christopher Columbus set off to Asia in search of gold, the most precious commodity in Spain at the time. On his expedition, Columbus instead wound up in what is now known as the Bahamas. As his ship approached, the natives of the land, the Arawaks, swam out to greet him and his crew with food and other goods. This was in contradistinction to the actions committed by Columbus’ men, as they came with greed to find gold and the power that came with it.  

Columbus, seeing that they had gold pieces in their ears, captured them aboard and impelled them to give directions to the source of which the gold was found. He then sailed to Hispaniola, where he found gold pieces within the rivers. With a hunger for more riches, Columbus imprisoned more natives and told Spain that he had found vast amounts of gold, fertile land, and overly-generous Indians, hoping to aggrandize himself by exaggerating his findings.

This led to a second expedition with more avaricious men, hungry for nothing but riches and power. Columbus and his men then enslaved more Indians and forced them to work in mines and on plantations. With the cruelty they endured, the Indians would fight and be killed, run away and be killed, or committed..ya know. No matter their actions, the natives were condemned to death. This dehumanization of the Indians led to the death of over half of an innocent culture in the span of just two short years.

This anomalous perspective of Columbus’ tale shows that what we whitewash as serendipitous discoveries filled with love and learning, was, in fact, simply an expedition fueled by greed and filled with death. This suppression of the true story glorifies Columbus and the emergence of our nation, rather than highlighting the way our people took advantage of the kindness of others and took the lives of the innocent for their own wealth. We defend Columbus’ inhumane nature by concluding that it leads to our own success, but it is questioned if murder and madness were truly necessary and if it can actually be justified by success.

With imposing such a great impact upon the history of our nation, the origin of racism is a topic of which has lingered ominously without being fully investigated or questioned by The People. As historians dig deep into the past, they can begin to see the inception of such ideology with the first indentured servants brought to the New World, caused by the experiences of those who first settled within the colonies.

It all begins with the winter of 1609. This winter, known as The Starving Time, was a time in which the settlers of Jamestown underwent extreme hardship and hunger. With too little food to eat and settlers dropping one by one, many reverted to drastic and severe measures such as cannibalism. In the face of this sinister sight, despite their more efficient means of survival,

many Native Americans were unable to help the settlers from their misfortune. The way in which the Indians were able to handle that winter indicated that despite the settlers’ advanced technology, they were inferior in means of survival. As many settlers even left to join the natives, their desperation turned toward the enemy; the savages that many once held their chins high above, were now being seen as those that everyone wished to be. With this change of roles, other colonists turned their desperation into anger. Many lashed out, burning and torturing the Indians in attempts to somehow prove their superiority.

6 0
3 years ago
How was the debate between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan resolved?
aev [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

La Campaña de Nueva York y Nueva Jersey fue una serie de batallas acaecidas entre julio de 1776 y marzo de 1777 en Nueva York y Nueva Jersey, entre los Estados Unidos al mando del general George Washington y el Reino de Gran Bretaña (ayudados por tropas alemanas de Hesse-Kassel y Waldeck) a las órdenes del general William Howe. Esta campaña se engloba dentro de la Guerra de Independencia de los Estados Unidos.

Howe tuvo éxito en conducir a Washington fuera de Nueva York, pero se extralimitó intentando reconquistar Nueva Jersey, y solo consiguión unos cuantos puestos de avanzada cerca de la ciudad. Los británicos tuvieron a Nueva York como sede para el resto de la guerra, utilizándola como base para expediciones contra otros objetivos.

En el primer desembarco sin oposición en Staten Island el 3 de julio de 1776, Howe reunió un ejército compuesto de soldados que habían sido retirados de Boston en marzo, tras su fracaso en mantener esa ciudad, junto con otras tropas británicas, así como tropas de Hesse arrendadas de varios principados alemanes. Washington tenía soldados de Nueva Inglaterra, así como los regimientos de los estados al sur hasta Virginia. Desembarcando en Long Island en agosto, Howe derrotó a Washington en la batalla más grande de la guerra, pero el Ejército Continental fue capaz de retirarse a Manhattan protegidos por la oscuridad y la niebla. Washington sufrió una serie de derrotas en Manhattan, con la excepción de una victoria en Harlem Heights, pero sin embargo fue perseguido al norte a White Plains, Nueva York. En ese punto Howe regresó a Manhattan para capturar las fuerzas que Washington había dejado en el norte de la isla.

Washington y gran parte de su ejército cruzaron el río Hudson en Nueva Jersey, y se retiraron al otro lado del río Delaware en Pensilvania, disminuyendo debido a la finalización de los períodos de alistamiento, las deserciones y desmoralización. Howe ordenó en diciembre el acuartelamiento de sus tropas por el invierno, estableciendo una cadena de puestos de avanzada de Nueva York a Burlington, Nueva Jersey. Washington, en un tremendo impulso para la moral estadounidense, lanzó un ataque exitoso contra la guarnición de Trenton después de cruzar el helado río Delaware, lo que llevó a Howe a retirar su cadena de puestos de avanzada de regreso a Nueva Brunswick y la costa cerca de Nueva York, mientras que Washington estableció su campamento de invierno en Morristown.

Gran Bretaña mantuvo el control de la ciudad de Nueva York y parte del territorio circundante hasta el término de la guerra en 1783, usándola como base para operaciones en otras partes de América del Norte. En 1777, el general Howe lanzó una campaña para capturar Filadelfia, dejando al general Henry Clinton al mando de la zona de Nueva York, mientras que el general John Burgoyne encabezó un intento de hacerse con el control del valle del río Hudson desde Quebec que falló en Saratoga. El norte de Nueva Jersey fue el escenario de escaramuzas entre las fuerzas de oposición por el resto de la guerra.

4 0
3 years ago
Summarize the political philosophy of John Locke.?
myrzilka [38]

The summary of the political philosophy of John Locke is the dismissal of the divine right of kings and advocacy for natural rights.

<h3>Who was John Locke?</h3>

He was an English philosopher that was one of the fathers of Enlightenment thinking and considered the father of liberalism.

Hence, we can see that the divine right of kings was one that was popular in those times about the rulership rights that were transferred from generation to generation, but he advocated for natural rights.

Read more about John Locke here:

brainly.com/question/524736

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
What is the President the Commander in Chief of?
Gwar [14]

Answer:

Army and Navy of the United States and of the Militia of the several other States

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one of the major factors contributing to the global water crisis?
    5·2 answers
  • Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from a Birmingham Jail argued that:
    12·2 answers
  • True or false the glorious revolution culminated in the passage of and acceptance by william and mary of parliament's petition o
    11·2 answers
  • The Presidential election of 1972 resulted in a landslide victory for
    12·2 answers
  • It was common for Wichita women to tattoo
    14·1 answer
  • Under Mexico’s rule of Texas, African Americans had all of the following rights EXCEPT:
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the industrial revolution​
    15·1 answer
  • What does the mirror
    9·1 answer
  • What did President Johnson fear, should the Democrats "lose" Vietnam
    12·1 answer
  • What empire fell during the 5th century and was replaced by the middle ages
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!