The context clues imply that the meaning of to grow up is the transition from childhood to adulthood.
<h3>What are context clues?</h3>
It should be noted that context clues are the hints that are given by the author in a literary work.
The term "culture" is a catch-all that refers to social behavior, institutions, and norms present in human societies as well as the people that make up these groups and their knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, conventions, abilities, and habits.
In this case, the context clues implies that the meaning of to grow up is the transition from childhood to adulthood.
Learn more about context clues on:
brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
Answer: A; they are more accurate with their corrections
Explanation: when you use a red pen you circle what’s wrong, and not what’s write! Therefore, you make clearer corrections
Answer:
Credibility and an American approach to sports analysis.
Explanation:
The biggest difference in sports analysis between Europe and America is, in many's view, the Americans' obsession with statistics. One cannot watch a sports game without the commentators using at least a dozen statistics to prove the greatness/importance of a team, player or game.
Gerald Early is no different. The task of writing about Jackie Robinson is not easy for anyone, with Robinson being such an important figure in American sports. Early was probably not the first and surely will not be the last to do that.
In order to add credibility to his writing, distinguish his work from those of other people and last, but not least, to appeal to the American reader, Early tries to use as many sources as possible to support his arguments. He does that masterfully because, instead of the sources diminishing Early's voice in the writing, they do the opposite. Gerald Early uses the sources to enhance his own voice by always making the sources' relevance dependent on his own claims.
According to a different source, this question refers to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In this case, the court issued a unanimous decision in favor of the Brown family. This decision was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
I would argue that Warren's rhetoric is persuasive and authoritative. He very clearly explains the reasons why the Court reached this decision. This conveys a feeling of knowledge and clarity. The line that I find most moving is:
<em>"To separate [black children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."</em>
I find this line to be very powerful because it gets to the source of the problem. By explaining how black children might feel, it encourages people to rethink segregation. It also supports the idea that all people are equally valuable, regardless of their color.
