Judicial thats what it is called
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
<span>I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. Students in the Indian boarding schools were forbidden from speaking in their native languages. Also, traditional names were replaced by new European-American names. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
Pluralistic ignorance
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs when <u>people go along with an action or a norm, because others are doing the same</u>, even though internally they do not agree with it.
<em>Pluralistic ignorance therefore explains a situation where bystanders do not react to an emergency because other bystanders appear unconcerned.</em>
Answer:
China, Hong Kong, Japan, Macau, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, and Taiwan.
Explanation:
