Modern foragers are not Stone Age relics, living fossils, lost tribes, or noble savages. Still, to the extent that foraging has been the basis of their subsistence, contemporary and recent hunter-gatherers can illustrate links between foraging economies and other aspects of society and culture, such as their sociopolitical organization.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the history of human beings on this planet, hunters-gatherers hold the longest history. Even today there are many societies where people rely on foraging for their sustenance and survival and have not adapted to the modern ways of civilised societies.
These modern foragers do not stuck in time and living the life of early man but they have developed well organised social and political structure for themselves. They possess their own culture and rituals to follow and their tribe issues are decided by the well-established political system.
If this is an actual problem you need to add more
The factors affect is :- Its monetary worth Its favorable/unfavorable characteristics like color or flavor Its sentiment values Hence, option (b) is the correct answer.
<h3>Is monetary a value?</h3>
Value is the appraised, monetary, or material value of an item, service, or asset. Numerous ideas are associated with the word "value," including shareholder value, company value, selling price, and market value. Valuation is the process of determining and establishing a value on something like a corporation or an asset.
<h3>Do you mean about monetary money?</h3>
The term "monetary" refers to money, particularly the total quantity of dosh in a nation. Several countries tighten their monetary policy to combat inflation.
To know more about Monetary visit :
brainly.com/question/1068495
#SPJ4
The Complete Question : When dividing discrete objects among people, what factors affect how much value a person places on all or part of an object?
(a). Its monetary worth
(b). Its favorable/unfavorable characteristics like color or flavor
(c). Its sentimental value
(d). All of the above
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: <span> Tell her where to find the information that she needs.
Since that associate has the ability to finish the work herself, directly helping her would only prevented her from becoming responsible for their own duty.
But that being said, you still need to help her since she's most likely still a novice and does not fully understand the full job description. Because of this, telling her where she can find the information/instruction would be the best option.</span>
