1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
11

Consider a market in which a firm has monopoly power. Suppose in addition that the firm produces under the presence of either a

positive or a negative externality. Does the externality necessarily lead to a greater misallocation of​ resources? A. No. In the presence of a negative​ externality, since the monopolist produces less than the competitive​ quantity, it may end up producing the socially efficient quantity.​ However, in the case of a positive​ externality, since a competitive market produces too​ little, a monopolist will only exacerbate the problem. B. Yes. In the presence of a negative​ externality, since the monopolist produces more than the competitive​ quantity, it will make the negative externality worse. And in the case of a positive​ externality, the monopolist will exploit its monopoly power and produce even less than a competitive​ market, thus exacerbating the problem. C. No. Given a market with monopoly power is already​ inefficient, the concept of a positive or negative externality does not apply. D. Yes. An externality presents an opportunity for a firm to exploit the situation to earn positive economic profits. In the case of a firm with monopoly​ power, this ability to exploit the situation is even greater and therefore the externality leads to a greater misallocation of resources.
Business
1 answer:
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A) No, in the presence of a negative externality, since the monopolist produces less than the competitive quantity, it may end up producing the socially efficient quantity.  However, in the case of a positive externality, since a competitive market produces too little, a monopolist will only exacerbate the problem.

Explanation:

Monopolists produce less than the competitive quantity (marginal revenue = marginal cost) but charge a higher price for their products. In case a negative externality is produced, then the competitive quantity should decrease and the monopolist might end up producing the socially efficient quantity.

Given the same scenario where the monopolist produces less than competitive quantity, but a positive externality is produced, then the socially efficient quantity should increase, but the monopolist will not increase their output.

You might be interested in
Melanie is the director of human resources for a small manufacturing firm. She has a strong personal interest in technology, and
zepelin [54]

Answer:

Influencer

Explanation:

An influencer is a person that has the ability to affect the purchasing decision of customers through their authority, position, relationship, or relationship.

They have good social relations and this is an asset in directing customer buying decision.

In the given scenario Melanie has a strong personal interest in technology, and is known throughout the firm as the one with the most knowledge about new kinds of communications technologies.

This knowledge will be beneficial in the buying centre, where she can be an influencer.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the 80/20 rule? A very small number of things in your life are going to contribute to something valuable. or A very smal
Airida [17]

A very small number of things in your life are going to contribute to something valuable

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is correct? A. Control is most effective when two or three people are given responsibility for
Furkat [3]

Answer:

"B"

Explanation:

Segregation of duties is a major international control procedure where responsibilities are shared between two or more individuals.

The aim is to minimize or prevent the opportunity for a particular individual to  execute and cover up fraudulent activities.

It is arranged in a way that an individual is in the position to keep a check over the activities of the other party.

3 0
3 years ago
5.) Which strategy for saving do you think would work best for you? Why? (3-6 sentences)
zhuklara [117]

Put it into a savings account because you can only take so muck out of it each year

7 0
3 years ago
As the video showed, there are many people who are so concerned about the viability of banks, and indeed the entire financial sy
sergeinik [125]
Hard question thx for the points give me brainlest points plz
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does demand-pull inflation differ from cost-push inflation?
    12·2 answers
  • We have a separate country known as Lezette-ville. The GDP per capita in 2010 was $18,000 in 2010 dollars. While in 2018, the GD
    10·1 answer
  • The 1974 model Eldorado is a three-ton behemoth with a 500-cubic-inch engine that is long on style but short on gas mileage. Dur
    15·1 answer
  • The Signal Company has operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense of $1,500,000. The company’s depreciation expense is
    9·1 answer
  • 13. The use of cross-functional teams in product design and preproduction manufacturing is known as: a. Manufacturability and va
    5·1 answer
  • 1. The loanable fund model tells us that, other things being equal, capital will tend to flow from countries with __ to countrie
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following disadvantages is associated with product layouts? a. little flexibility for the customer b. low reliance
    9·1 answer
  • LO 1.4Which of the following is not a step in the outline for examining ethical issues?
    11·1 answer
  • A restaurateur spends $61 on labor and materials to produce 8 meals. by increasing these costs to $78, he can produce 14 meals.
    7·2 answers
  • Q23. It is said that controlling function is the best source to judge the accuracy of the
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!