Answer:
1. Reputation.
Apple and IBM are big companies which is why their reputation was able to survive the bribery charges. You are most likely not as big as either of these companies so if you are charged with bribery, your reputation might not be able to recover like theirs did.
It is always best to be associated with a good reputation. A good reputation gives you customers who will be loyal because they appreciate the integrity you have. You should not throw this away by bribing people.
2. Consequences.
It is because Apple and IBM are so big that they were able to settle the bribery charge with the Courts. Smaller companies or people that have lesser effects on the financial system might find that their punishments will be more severe to act as a deterrent.
Answer:
Letter A is correct. <u>Fostering competition.</u>
Explanation:
In this case, it is correct to say that small businesses are fostering competition.
Competition in the business world can be defined as a situation where two or more companies that supply products are rivals in the quest to conquer the same market and the same customers.
Large companies often have some dominance and influence over the market, which means that they impose various barriers to market entry by other competing companies, especially if they are micro-companies. In the case of the above question, when there are a large number of small companies looking to establish themselves in a specific niche in the market, due to possible retaliation by large companies, together, they are exerting an influence on the market that promotes competition.
Answer:
new net worth = 79.2 billion
Explanation:
given data
net worth = $76.0 billion
gains = $3.20 billion
to get here
new net worth
solution
we get here new net worth that is express as
new net worth = net worth + gains .............................1
put here value and we will get here
new net worth = $76.0 billion + $3.20 billion
new net worth = 79.2 billion
They benefit producers and hurt consumers