Answer:
Length of the rectangle = 16 inches
Width of the rectangle = 12 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the length of the rectangle be represented by x.
Then width can be expressed as ![\[\frac{x}{2}+4\] ](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B2%7D%2B4%5C%5D%0A)
Perimeter of a rectangle is the sum of four sides of the rectangle.
This can be expressed as 2*(length + breadth)
= ![\[2* (x + \frac{x}{2}+4)\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B2%2A%20%28x%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B2%7D%2B4%29%5C%5D)
= ![\[2* (\frac{3x}{2}+4)\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B2%2A%20%28%5Cfrac%7B3x%7D%7B2%7D%2B4%29%5C%5D)
= ![\[3x + 8\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B3x%20%2B%208%5C%5D)
But perimeter is given as 56.
So, ![\[3x + 8 = 56\] ](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B3x%20%2B%208%20%3D%2056%5C%5D%0A)
=> ![\[3x = 48\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B3x%20%3D%2048%5C%5D)
=> ![\[x = 16\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5Bx%20%3D%2016%5C%5D)
Hence length of the rectangle = 16 inches
Width of the rectangle = ![\[\frac{16}{2}+4\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B%5Cfrac%7B16%7D%7B2%7D%2B4%5C%5D)
= 12 inches
Answer:
(x - 1)² = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
x² - 2x + 1 = 0 ( subtract 1 from both sides )
x² - 2x = - 1
To complete the square
add ( half the coefficient of the x- term )² to both sides
x² + 2(- 1)x + 1 = - 1 + 1
(x - 1)² = 0
A relation is a function if each element of the domain is paired with exactly one element of the range. ... If given a table, or a set of ordered pairs, you can look to see if any value of the domain has more than one corresponding value in the range.
tbh google
Answer:
96°
Step-by-step explanation:
Opposite angles in a parallelogram are equal.
You can see how this works by thinking through what's going on.
In the first year the population declines by 3%. So the population at the end of the first year is the starting population (1200) minus the decline: 1200 minus 3% of 1200. 3% of 1200 is the same as .03 * 1200. So the population at the end of the first year is 1200 - .03 * 1200. That can be written as 1200 * (1 - .03), or 1200 * 0.97
What about the second year? The population starts at 1200 * 0.97. It declines by 3% again. But 3% of what??? The decline is based on the population at the beginning of the year, NOT based no the original population. So the decline in the second year is 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97). And just as in the first year, the population at the end of the second year is the population at the beginning of the second year minus the decline in the second year. So that's 1200 * 0.97 - 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97), which is equal to 1200 * 0.97 (1 - 0.03) = 1200 * 0.97 * 0.97 = 1200 * 0.972.
So there's a pattern. If you worked out the third year, you'd see that the population ends up as 1200 * 0.973, and it would keep going like that.
So the population after x years is 1200 * 0.97x
