According to Dalrymple, people who are unhappy often mistakenly self-diagnose themselves as depressed and say that they are "depressed" rather than "unhappy". Dalrymple claimed that unhappiness commonly results from poor life choices, whereas, depression is considered to be a medically diagnosable condition that is separate and external to people. He further claimed that a healthy diet, regular exercise, adequate sleep and regular socialization will get rid of people's so called "depression".
While Dalrymple's perspective has some merits, I am not entirely persuaded and in favor of his argument. While I agree that people tend to mistaken their unhappiness as depression, I believe that there is a fundamental difference between the two. This is because, scientific research provides adequate evidence suggesting that depressed individuals have differences in brain functioning compared to non-depressed individuals.
Answer:
In simple words, While defending perpetrators of international rights abuses is a popular thread that runs across almost all contemporary governments, who they endorse and just how much they endorse changes dramatically based on the democratic environment. For example, if a US adversary was abusing human rights, we would undoubtedly be outspoken in our assistance, but if a US ally was doing so, we would likely only turn a blind eye.
The destruction of an opponent’s resources is the best description of a scorched earth policy.
Option B
<u>Explanation</u>:
A strategy used by the military of a nation that aims to destroy the assets which might be useful for the opponent or enemy to attack when retreating from a position. This military strategy used becomes a policy which is known as scorched earth policy.
The assets they aims to destroy are usually weapons, any industrial resources, communication sites and vehicles used for transportation. This whole process is carried by the military either in the enemy territory or in its home territory while invading.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Procedural justice relates to the concept of equity in conflict resolution procedures and the distribution of assets. One dimension of constitutional justice relates to the judicial management and civil proceedings conversations.
Procedural justice involves the equality and accountability of the decision-making procedures which can be linked with distributive punishment which retributive liberty. Hearing both stakeholders before a judgment is rendered is some phase that should be deemed appropriate such that a procedure can then be described as procedurally reasonable.