Answer:
In this case, 21st Century would probably win the lawsuit since its brochure never stated a specific amount of time, for example, 3, 5, or 10 years. So it cannot be considered an express warranty. Besides, the fact that the wheelchair actually lasted a few years (doesn't specify how many), it is more than consumer protection laws generally require.
Many companies moved their operations from new england and the midwest to locations in the south because: the South had less expensive site factors than northern regions.
<h3>Change of operation location from midwest to south</h3>
The major reason why most companies tend to moved their operation to south was to maximize profit.
Compare to midwest, the site factors such as rew material, labor and land were more cheaper in the south.
This companies change their operation location because they want to reduce cost as their aims and objective is to generate or maximize profit.
Inconclusion the South had less expensive site factors than northern regions.
Learn more about Change of operation location from midwest to south here:brainly.com/question/503796
Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Since at December 31, Year 5, Tedd's tax advisor believed that an unfavorable outcome was <u>probable</u>. And a <u>reasonable estimate </u>of additional taxes was $400,000 but could be as much as $600,000.
Although after the Year 5 financial statements were issued, Tedd received and accepted an IRS settlement offer of $450,000.
Tedd should have included an amount of $400,000 as accrued liability in its December 31, Year 5 balance sheet
The reason is that according to the International Financial Reporting Standards, a PROVISION must be made as long as the conditions below were obtainable at year end.
- Existing Condition (which in this case is the tax dispute with the IRS)
- Probable Cash Outflow (which Tedd's Tax adviser confirmed)
- Reliable Estimate of Outflow ( which the scenario stated ''A reasonable estimate of additional taxes was $400,000'')
Hence, such 'reasonable estimate is the appropriate amount for inclusion in the financial statements.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
